From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA00470; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:24:31 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA05431 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:24:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rabelais.socialtools.net (rabelais.socialtools.net [81.2.94.243]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i36HPKjq008669 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:25:20 +0200 Received: by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix, from userid 108) id 04D46232DF; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:24:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from socialtools.net (chaucer.socialtools.net [81.2.94.242]) by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E2B232DA; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:24:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4072E7C4.5090008@socialtools.net> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 18:24:20 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, fr, it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net Cc: Vasili Galchin , Dustin Sallings , Kenneth Knowles , caml-list Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) References: <20040406042014.85553.qmail@web41210.mail.yahoo.com> <1081236270.19232.41.camel@pelican> In-Reply-To: <1081236270.19232.41.camel@pelican> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on rabelais.socialtools.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 model:01 model:01 caml:01 unix:02 wrote:03 library:03 cathedral:95 mean:05 completeness:93 benjamin:07 similar:09 language:10 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 77 skaller wrote: > Caml has a different development model, and one can > imagine a reluctance to move it closer to the C++ > model for fear the result might be similar .. Do you mean wide use of the language in industry? :) Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners