From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA12194; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:24:13 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA16001 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:24:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from woodstock.1969.ws (64-215-156-42.eosinc.net [64.215.156.42]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2JNOcKW027787 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:24:41 +0100 Received: (qmail 8187 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 23:24:24 -0000 Received: from karl.1969.ws (HELO 1969.ws) (10.3.2.15) by woodstock.1969.ws with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 23:24:24 -0000 Message-ID: <405B8103.9050709@1969.ws> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:23:47 -0800 From: Karl Zilles Organization: 1969 Communications, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Stokes CC: Benjamin Geer , Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Structuring the Caml community (Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar) References: <1FBC9CE8-79D8-11D8-ACC9-000A95A1E69A@csun.edu> <405B7569.9080404@socialtools.net> <4D60BD1C-79FB-11D8-ACC9-000A95A1E69A@csun.edu> In-Reply-To: <4D60BD1C-79FB-11D8-ACC9-000A95A1E69A@csun.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml's:01 mailed:98 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 referenced:02 structuring:02 wrote:03 cathedral:95 maintainer:04 news:94 news:94 eric:06 discussion:08 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 252 Eric Stokes wrote: > And what makes all that you've said really bad is that www.ocaml.org is > the first site I found. And I've found > it referenced in lots of other places. I still claim that the current > www.ocaml.org site HAS the right idea, > and has a decent format. It isn't perfect, but what is. If some of the > links to dead end projects were cleaned > off it, and the news items were updated, it would be a very good site. Yes. I just mailed the maintainer: > There is currently a discussion about the ocaml.org web page going on in the ocaml mailing list. > > Someone points out that the lack of updates in the news section makes it looks like ocaml is a dead language. Since there is no indication on ocaml.org that it is not an "official" ocaml page, and since it is currently the #1 hit when you search for ocaml on google... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners