From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA14275; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:58:41 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA14251 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:58:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.48]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JMwcHd001838 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:58:39 +0100 Received: from cpe-66-1-251-143.co.sprintbbd.net ([66.1.251.143] helo=earthlink.net) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B4Swl-0003X6-00 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:58:35 -0800 Message-ID: <405B7B20.3070207@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:58:40 -0700 From: "Matthew O'Connor" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Structuring the Caml community (Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar) References: <1FBC9CE8-79D8-11D8-ACC9-000A95A1E69A@csun.edu> <405B7569.9080404@socialtools.net> In-Reply-To: <405B7569.9080404@socialtools.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml's:01 perl's:01 unmaintained:01 'ocaml':01 ocaml:01 caml:01 caml:01 structuring:02 wrote:03 wrote:03 snip:04 cathedral:95 news:94 impression:06 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 250 Benjamin Geer wrote: > Eric Stokes wrote: > >> (the index site, see #1) >> http://www.ocaml.org/ >> >> Actually is a very good index site, almost on par with perl's. Has all >> the relevant requirements, > > > I think it's an embarrassment. It's an unmaintained site that hasn't > updated since 2002. > As you point out, > the news items haven't been updated since 2002, which strongly gives the > impression that Caml is completely dead. This is also especially bad for people like me who didn't know until recently that it's not the official site (but there's no mention on caml.inria.fr that it is). Oh, and it's the first hit on Google for 'ocaml'. Matt ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners