From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] naming parts of optional arguments?
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:35:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030728092556.02f23270@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030728161851Y.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
>No contradiction at all: ?xy: is a label, not a variable name.
Well, except for in this case, of course, when it is a variable name:
# let f ?xy () = xy;;
val f : ?xy:'a -> unit -> 'a option = <fun>
>If you care about length, you can still write:
> let f ?(xy=(0,0)) () = xy
No, because I need to break out the parts of the tuple and name the whole
tuple, which was the point of the thread, so the only way to do that I can
see is this beautiful expression:
# let f ?xy:((x,y) as xy = 0,0) () = xy,x,y;;
val f : ?xy:int * int -> unit -> (int * int) * int * int = <fun>
All I'm saying is that having the first example above work leads one to
believe the xy is usable inside the function body in general.
On the whole, the syntax for defining default parameters is nonintuitive
and inconsistent, because you need the parenthesis sometimes, you need the
"as xy" sometimes, you need the ?label: sometimes, etc.
Chris
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-28 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-28 1:05 Chris Hecker
2003-03-28 1:10 ` Chris Hecker
[not found] ` <8F4A019E-60BD-11D7-829E-000393BA7EBA@wetware.com>
2003-03-28 2:11 ` Chris Hecker
2003-07-28 3:41 ` Chris Hecker
2003-07-28 7:18 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-07-28 16:35 ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2003-07-29 3:19 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-07-29 21:52 ` Chris Hecker
2003-03-28 1:43 ` Max Kirillov
2003-03-28 1:32 Matt Gushee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20030728092556.02f23270@localhost \
--to=checker@d6.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox