Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>,
	Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>
Cc: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>, Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:08:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030326110515.035919b0@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030326113856.GA4522@iliana>


I think this thread is a misunderstanding masquerading as an argument.

Alex, I think people (well, I do at least :) want to hear what the 
differences between a namespace and the module system are.  It seems on the 
face of it that fixing pack's implementation would solve the namespace 
problem (this was Sven's thought as well), but you don't think so (or think 
it's the wrong way to fix it), and I'd like to understand why, since you've 
obviously thought about it a bunch.

Thanks,
Chris

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-26 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-25 19:33 Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-03-26  8:25 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26  8:33   ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26  9:00     ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 10:50       ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 11:24         ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 11:38           ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 19:08             ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2003-03-26 21:08               ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-27 17:23                 ` David Brown
2003-03-27 19:46                 ` Chris Hecker
2003-03-28  5:33                   ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-28  5:35                     ` David Brown
2003-03-28 14:10                   ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-28 15:00                     ` Sven Luther
2003-03-30 10:06                       ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-30 10:38                         ` Sven Luther
2003-04-01 14:14                           ` [Caml-list] naming conflicts (was: camlimages vs. labltk) Damien Doligez
2003-04-01 15:05                             ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2003-04-01 19:51                             ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-08 10:33                               ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-31  1:21                         ` [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Chris Hecker
2003-03-30  9:26                     ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 18:49     ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-03-26 10:48   ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2003-03-26 10:55     ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 14:10       ` Stefano Zacchiroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20030326110515.035919b0@localhost \
    --to=checker@d6.com \
    --cc=alex@baretta.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox