* [Caml-list] An elementary question about ocamlmktop
@ 2002-11-28 7:44 Ching-Tsun Chou
2002-11-30 19:28 ` Chris Hecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ching-Tsun Chou @ 2002-11-28 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
I'm sure this question of mine has a simple answer, but, alas, I
couldn't figure it out myself after many trials!
Suppose I have a subdirectory "zzz" under my home directory which
contains a file "foo.ml" whose content is:
$ cat zzz/foo.ml
let hello () = Printf.printf "Hello, world!\n"
where "$ " is the shell prompt. Now I do the following:
$ cd zzz
$ ocamlmktop foo.ml -o foo
$ ./foo
Objective Caml version 3.06
# Foo.hello () ;;
Hello, world!
- : unit = ()
So far, so good. But now I do the following:
$ cd
$ zzz/foo
Objective Caml version 3.06
# Foo.hello () ;;
Characters 0-9:
Foo.hello () ;;
^^^^^^^^^
Unbound value Foo.hello
I think the problem is that ocamlrun can't find "foo.cmi", since the
same problem occurs even in "zzz" if "foo.cmi" is removed (removing
"foo.cmo" apparently has no effect). However, if I do:
$ zzz/foo -I ~/zzz
Objective Caml version 3.06
# Foo.hello () ;;
Hello, world!
- : unit = ()
then everything works again (assuming "zzz/foo.cmi" is still there).
My question is: Is there any way to generate a toplevel "foo" that
contains the information in "foo.cmi", so that it can (so to speak)
exists by itself?
Many thanks in advance!
- Ching Tsun
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] An elementary question about ocamlmktop
2002-11-28 7:44 [Caml-list] An elementary question about ocamlmktop Ching-Tsun Chou
@ 2002-11-30 19:28 ` Chris Hecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Hecker @ 2002-11-30 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ching-Tsun Chou, caml-list
>My question is: Is there any way to generate a toplevel "foo" that
>contains the information in "foo.cmi", so that it can (so to speak)
>exists by itself?
Nope, not right now. This is a problem for dynlinking modules, too. The
cmis all have to be there. You can -pack them, but that has other
issues. This is an FAQ, search the list archives.
Chris
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-30 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-28 7:44 [Caml-list] An elementary question about ocamlmktop Ching-Tsun Chou
2002-11-30 19:28 ` Chris Hecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox