From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>,
Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>,
Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr>,
caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK with Ocaml 3.06 (fwd)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:34:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20021014233030.03427018@mail.d6.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021015054154.GA2512@iliana>
> > >But the -pack option is not yet standardized, and not used in much
> > >cases, it seems to me.
> > It's brand new, so give it time (and we need to get it working on windows,
>It was in since 3.04, wasn't it ?
Nope, 3.05, so it's pretty new!
>You know from previous threads that i
>strongly advocate its use for all libraries, including pervasives, the
>standard library. This is for namespace control, not distribution.
I agree, hopefully the whole standard library will be -packed in the next
release (assuming we fix the windows -pack, which is likely). Perhaps that
will break too much stuff, though...
There's also the question of how smart the linker is on packed
objects...hopefully it will only link used modules and functions (and the C
linker will do the same). A few tests could answer this...
>Well, apple uses it (for darwin) so there should be no portability
>issues. But then, i would have done a ocaml reimplementation, which
>would allow to do some more advanced stuff, like checking for external
>dependencies, which are not packaged. This cannot be done with the
>standard dpkg/apt.
Yes, but if we don't even have time to use apt, we definitely don't have
time to rewrite it. :) I think going with something that works but is
nonoptimal is the way to start making progress on this problem.
Chris
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-14 16:42 Alain Frisch
2002-10-14 17:39 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-10-14 17:59 ` Alain Frisch
2002-10-14 18:16 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-14 20:38 ` Pierre Weis
2002-10-14 21:07 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-14 22:44 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-10-15 4:42 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-15 4:53 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-15 5:15 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-15 5:25 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-15 5:41 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-15 6:34 ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2002-10-15 5:02 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-15 5:04 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-15 5:08 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-17 17:57 ` Gleb N. Semenov
2002-10-15 11:21 ` Sign the packages (was Re: [Caml-list] CDK with Ocaml 3.06 (fwd)) Tim Freeman
2002-10-15 11:59 ` Sven Luther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20021014233030.03427018@mail.d6.com \
--to=checker@d6.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=pierre.weis@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox