From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 12:23:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20021006121213.01876da8@mail.d6.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021006205517.B19829@verdot.inria.fr>
It's obviously clear from the list archives that people think campl4 is a
very good thing. It's a great and useful tool. It makes the ocaml system
more powerful. It's a win. From a user's perspective, it is by far better
if it is included in the main distribution/installation so my programs can
use it and be portable to other people's installations.
It would be great if the drama associated with it could just go away...as
we say here in the states, "Can't we all just get along?" It's impossible
to tell who is at "fault" in the machinations from the weird snippets we
see on the list, but I doubt any user on the list actually gives a flying
lambda. We just want to use ocaml. You guys all need some group therapy,
and to resolve your differences like adults, and get back to work.
Thanks for a great language,
Chris
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-06 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-06 18:55 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:23 ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2002-10-06 19:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:01 ` brogoff
2002-10-06 21:09 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:29 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 20:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
[not found] ` <200210062143.g96Lhix15834@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
2002-10-07 2:47 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:28 ` Dave Mason
2002-10-06 20:50 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 21:03 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:46 ` Florian Douetteau
2002-10-07 2:56 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 23:54 ` Markus Mottl
2002-10-07 9:06 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 11:34 ` Kontra, Gergely
2002-10-11 12:56 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-11 13:15 ` [Caml-list] Future " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-12 21:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-13 9:02 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 16:36 ` [Caml-list] Syntax brogoff
2002-10-07 7:21 ` [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4 Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 8:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:25 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 11:30 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:55 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-08 7:57 ` Alessandro Baretta
[not found] ` <nhalm59cf0s.fsf@malabar.mitre.org>
2002-10-08 14:05 ` Alessandro Baretta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20021006121213.01876da8@mail.d6.com \
--to=checker@d6.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox