From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: non-symbol infix functions
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:44:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001018024350.033bb1d0@walt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200010180929.LAA27375@pauillac.inria.fr>
>But, no, you can ``do it internally'', if you wanted to write the
>corresponding Caml code.
Right, I meant for an arbitrary identifier.
Anyway, is there a rationale for this? Was it just not worth the effort, or did it lead to ambiguities or something?
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-18 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-18 1:33 Chris Hecker
2000-10-18 9:29 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-18 9:44 ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2000-10-18 13:30 ` Pierre Weis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20001018024350.033bb1d0@walt \
--to=checker@d6.com \
--cc=Pierre.Weis@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox