From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA28616 for caml-red; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:21:36 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA25184 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:50:33 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from www.chasm.org (adsl-63-195-80-23.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.80.23])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e6JGoWn22332
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:50:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from aria.chasm.org (aria [192.168.0.3])
	by www.chasm.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12975
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from point@chasm.org)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20000719094927.00aaee20@chasm.org>
X-Sender: point@chasm.org
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:50:27 -0700
To: caml-list@inria.fr
From: Jack Point <point@chasm.org>
Subject: Different GCs for OCaml
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

How easy would it be to try different GC strategies with OCaml?