From: David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>,
caml-list@inria.fr, ocaml-gui@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Feeding the OCaml GUI troll
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:28:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d13dcfc0509010628155a4d6e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125580528.7192.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hello,
2005/9/1, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>:
> I am. My idea is this: GET RID OF CALLBACKS.
> The idea is to use (user space) threads instead.
The main issue with threads is that as soon as you want to share
state/data between threads, it becomes a mess. Of course, you can have
some clean tools like OCaml channels in module Event, but they don't
avoid issues like deadlocks.
The callback and main event handler scheme as the advantage of
simplicity: your program does only one thing at a time.
Yours,
d.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-28 15:38 Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
[not found] ` <aefe758210f7fa0b9846b0ea4278cf3a@rouaix.org>
2005-08-28 23:21 ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-29 22:33 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 4:39 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 11:39 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-30 11:48 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 12:22 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:45 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 15:47 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 16:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:25 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:20 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:26 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 14:09 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 16:21 ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-08-30 17:47 ` [Caml-list] " David Thomas
2005-08-30 18:06 ` Tyler Eaves
2005-08-30 19:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:55 ` Chris Campbell
[not found] ` <c22844d10508301553b54841b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-30 22:56 ` Fwd: " Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 23:04 ` Doug Kirk
2005-08-31 0:08 ` Fwd: " Jon Harrop
2005-08-31 0:31 ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-08-31 8:48 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-31 9:06 ` Proposal a GUI from Ocamlsdl Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-31 14:39 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 19:27 ` Nathaniel Gray
2005-08-31 14:27 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:49 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:15 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-09-01 13:28 ` David MENTRE [this message]
2005-09-01 13:50 ` skaller
2005-09-01 14:43 ` Chris Campbell
2005-09-02 7:40 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-09-02 12:39 ` skaller
2005-09-03 10:34 ` Damien Bobillot
2005-09-03 12:30 ` skaller
2005-09-04 14:08 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-03 11:10 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-03 11:30 ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-09-03 17:23 ` Doug Kirk
2005-09-04 14:01 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-01 19:23 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Nathaniel Gray
2005-09-01 4:31 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 4:17 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:25 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 7:16 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-30 9:53 ` GUI for OCaml Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-30 10:28 ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:04 ` Bünzli Daniel
2005-08-30 17:13 ` David Thomas
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Mark Shinwell
2005-08-30 14:22 ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-30 23:12 ` Pietro Abate
2005-08-30 14:14 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Richard Jones
2005-08-30 15:33 ` mmzeeman
2005-08-30 15:44 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:34 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-01 4:58 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 16:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 16:25 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:49 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 16:03 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:31 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-31 8:19 ` About Lablgtk2 (was: e: GUI for OCaml) David MENTRE
2005-09-03 11:41 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 17:35 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Olivier Andrieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d13dcfc0509010628155a4d6e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.mentre@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mgushee@havenrock.com \
--cc=ocaml-gui@googlegroups.com \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox