From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA21701 for caml-red; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:22:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA18294 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 04:10:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from tequila.cs.yale.edu (tequila.cs.yale.edu [128.36.229.152]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eA33AKv25837 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 04:10:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from tequila.cs.yale.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tequila.cs.yale.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA12742 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 22:10:10 -0500 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: lists.caml Subject: Re: Redefinition doesn't work References: <39ff158f$1@tequila.cs.yale.edu> <200011021542.QAA07895@pauillac.inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.90 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Path: rum.cs.yale.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu Message-ID: <3a022c8d$1@tequila.cs.yale.edu> Date: 2 Nov 2000 22:10:05 -0500 X-Trace: 2 Nov 2000 22:10:05 -0500, rum.cs.yale.edu Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Weis writes: > Absolutely right. In the same vein we have: the absence of static > type-checking ``never seems to bother Lisp users'', the absence of GC > ``never seems to bother C users'', the absence of dynamically > allocated arrays ``never seems to bother Pascal users'', the absence > of pattern matching ``never seems to bother Pascal users''... .... ...., the absence of rebinding in the interactive loop ``never seems to bother OCaml users''.... Stefan ;-)