From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA27017; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:42:05 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA27404 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:42:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from shockwave.systems.pipex.net (shockwave.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.9]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hBOBg3b25194 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:42:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from jollys.org (81-86-211-188.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.211.188]) by shockwave.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8BB1C005CE for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:42:02 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3FE97B8D.2040906@jollys.org> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:42:05 +0000 From: Peter Jolly Reply-To: caml-list User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (20031216) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml syntax. References: <1072261671.2702.67.camel@pelican> In-Reply-To: <1072261671.2702.67.camel@pelican> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 endmatch:01 endmatch:01 caml's:01 ocaml:01 syntax:02 match:02 match:02 wrote:03 ugly:05 desirable:05 idiom:08 otherwise:15 opinion:15 but:16 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk skaller wrote: > match .. with .. endmatch ... > My opinion is that the endmatch > is ugly, longwinded, but otherwise desirable. How is this different from Caml's idiom, "begin match .. with .. end"? ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners