From: Eric Dahlman <edahlman@atcorp.com>
To: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <Diego.FERNANDEZ_PONS@etu.upmc.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Rounding mode
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:47:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB3A794.5030704@atcorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.44.0311121746120.3178538-100000@ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr>
Hi Diego,
I looked at that page thanks a bunch! That was just what I was hoping
for and it answered many of my questions.
-Eric
Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
>
>>Somewhat off topic but why is this necessary from a numerical math
>>type of perspective. I am honestly curious as I don't see how this
>>would interact with the calculation in a meaningful way.
>
>
> You are right when you say that there are many sources of errors in
> numerical computations and that rounding errors are usually
> insignificant with respect to them.
>
> The point is that stochastic arithmetic (and its deterministic variant
> interval arithmetic) are useful to find where the accurancy of your
> computation is falling drastically (e.g. cancellations)
>
> I really haven't the place to explain extensively how CESTAC works but
> there are a few explanations in the ANP website
>
> http://anp.lip6.fr/cadna/Accueil.php
>
> (CADNA for C/C++ source codes, user's guide. Chapter 4. Survey of the
> CESTAC method. Many examples also on the homepages).
>
> The main idea is that in a first order approximation, the number of
> significant digits of a result can be estimated with respects to the
> dispersion of the different values it can take using several rounding
> modes.
>
> Then, you can avoid doing unstable computations like dividing by a
> small number (epsilon) very noised which makes you believe it is a
> good 'pivot' in a gaussian resolution, etc. The whole computation will
> then give a more accurate value.
>
> The website gives an example where usual gauss method finds
>
> x1 = 60 x2 = - 8.9 x3 = 0.0 and x4 = 1.0
>
> when you estimate the errors, you find
>
> x1 = 1.0 x2 = 1.0 x3 = 0.1 e-07 and x4 = 1.0
>
> exact values are
>
> x1 = 1 x2 = 1 x3 = 0.1 e-07 x4 = 1
>
> The difference is only due to a 'bad' pivot succesfully detected and
> therefore avoided.
>
>
> Diego Olivier
>
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-13 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-07 17:27 [Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation? Fred Smith
2003-11-10 13:24 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2003-11-10 13:49 ` [Caml-list] Rounding mode Christophe Raffalli
2003-11-10 14:10 ` Eric Dahlman
2003-11-10 18:03 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-10 20:35 ` Eric Dahlman
2003-11-10 23:09 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-17 21:15 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-11-12 17:19 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2003-11-13 15:47 ` Eric Dahlman [this message]
2003-11-17 17:03 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2003-11-10 21:23 ` Christophe Raffalli
[not found] ` <16305.25815.3793.545198@karryall.dnsalias.org>
2003-11-12 15:35 ` [Caml-list] Rounding mode + extended Christophe Raffalli
2003-11-13 17:35 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-11-10 19:28 ` [Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation? Julien Signoles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB3A794.5030704@atcorp.com \
--to=edahlman@atcorp.com \
--cc=Diego.FERNANDEZ_PONS@etu.upmc.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox