From: Ken Rose <kenarose@earthlink.net>
To: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4: generating printers of types
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:01:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DF54B05.6E72368@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021009151317.J1703@verdot.inria.fr>
Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> In Camlp4 tutorial (current version), I added a section explaining how
> to make a syntax extension which, when loaded, automatically generates
> printers of all your types:
>
> For example, if your input file contains:
>
> type colour = Red | Green | Blue
>
> this will be interpreted like this:
>
> type colour = Red | Green | Blue
> let print_colour =
> function
> Red -> print_string "Red"
> | Green -> print_string "Green"
> | Blue -> print_string "Blue"
I've been working on extending this to more general types, which I
suppose would be easy for someone who's had some practice with camlp4.
I'm running into 2 problems, and anticipating a third one.
1. Is there a clean way to handle (sum) types with constructors with
multiple module qualifications? I hacked the example to deal with
Foo.bar, but it doesn't seem to extend automatically to Foo.Bar.baz. As
I understand it, I'd need a new pattern for each additional uid.
2. How are tuples represented in camlp4's syntax? This is so I can
match them when analyzing a type.
3. This is the big one. When working on a type like:
type t = int
with the obvious extention to Daniel's code, the preprocessor produces
type t = int let rec print_t = print_int
Which the compiler rejects with "This kind of expression is not allowed
as right-hand side of `let rec'" I haven't been able to figure out a
way to sneak it past, either. What's going on here? Why can't I rename
print_int?
Thanks
- ken
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-10 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-09 13:13 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-09 17:18 ` Markus Mottl
2002-10-25 19:20 ` Ken Rose
2002-10-25 20:02 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-26 0:11 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-12-10 2:01 ` Ken Rose [this message]
2002-12-10 12:25 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-12-10 15:33 ` Ken Rose
2002-12-10 17:38 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-12-10 13:20 ` Damien Doligez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DF54B05.6E72368@earthlink.net \
--to=kenarose@earthlink.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
--cc=rose@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox