From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA19354; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:44 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA19267 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ebene.inrialpes.fr (ebene.inrialpes.fr [194.199.18.70]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g9F7Yg516643 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from noyer.inrialpes.fr (noyer.inrialpes.fr [194.199.18.68]) by ebene.inrialpes.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9F7Yfo04765 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:41 +0200 (MEST) Received: from inrialpes.fr (adret.inrialpes.fr [194.199.23.65]) by noyer.inrialpes.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3/ImagV2) with ESMTP id g9F7YgU13302 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:42 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <3DABC510.5010801@inrialpes.fr> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:40 +0200 From: Frederic Tronel User-Agent: Netscape X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Problem with ocamlc and recursive and parametrized classes References: <3DAAA035.6020809@inrialpes.fr> <3DAAA5BF.9010901@inrialpes.fr> <3DAB3E82.6050600@baretta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk To close the thread, I should mention that the compilation eventually ends up in almost an hour. So the compiler was not locked in an endless loop. I had this feeling. > > Yes and no. Yes if the compiler is correct, but occasionally a bug might > slip in, and cause the compiler to loop endlessly. > >> Sorry for the previous post. Is there any plan to improve the behaviour >> of the compiler in the future ? (if possible of course). > > > I don't want to sound flamish, but I really don't think this question is > appropriate on this mailing list. In fact, my question was rather is there any improvements about this "problem" integrated in the CVS for example. > Best wishes for your O'Caml project. Thanks a lot. Frederic. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners