From: Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>
To: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>,
Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 22:24:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA09BE8.3020102@baretta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021006220127.B20005@verdot.inria.fr>
Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:29:59PM -0400, Oleg wrote:
>
>
>>Could you explain what you mean by "compromising the future of Camlp4"?
>>I thought Camlp4 project was not affiliated with the O'Caml project / team.
>
>
> It would be good, indeed, that Camlp4 be separated from OCaml, but
> the direction of the OCaml team refuses that energically. However
> it was a good compromise.
>
> He jeopardizes the future of Camlp4 because he gives me two choices:
> either return working on the ocaml/camlp4 version (what I refuse), or
> quit the projet. And if I quit the projet, who is going to improve
> Camlp4?
>:-|
Why in the world do you guys take such strong stands in your
respective positions? I am no one to give you advice, but,
really, take it easy...
> Ok Camlp4 will not die then: it will just be maintained, debugged,
> just like Caml Light. No future developpment can happen, since nobody
> knows Camlp4 like me.
As an aside, what is the purpose of developing Caml Light,
anyway. Should it not simply be superseded by O'Caml?
Alex
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-06 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-06 18:55 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:23 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-06 19:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:01 ` brogoff
2002-10-06 21:09 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:29 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 20:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Alessandro Baretta [this message]
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
[not found] ` <200210062143.g96Lhix15834@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
2002-10-07 2:47 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:28 ` Dave Mason
2002-10-06 20:50 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 21:03 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:46 ` Florian Douetteau
2002-10-07 2:56 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 23:54 ` Markus Mottl
2002-10-07 9:06 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 11:34 ` Kontra, Gergely
2002-10-11 12:56 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-11 13:15 ` [Caml-list] Future " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-12 21:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-13 9:02 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 16:36 ` [Caml-list] Syntax brogoff
2002-10-07 7:21 ` [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4 Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 8:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:25 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 11:30 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:55 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-08 7:57 ` Alessandro Baretta
[not found] ` <nhalm59cf0s.fsf@malabar.mitre.org>
2002-10-08 14:05 ` Alessandro Baretta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA09BE8.3020102@baretta.com \
--to=alex@baretta.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox