Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yaron M. Minsky" <yminsky@CS.Cornell.EDU>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Bp_val and Data_custom_val
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:54:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D88DA09.4010906@cs.cornell.edu> (raw)

I'm wondering if someone can help me out in understanding the difference 
between Bp_val and Data_custom_val.  These are both macros for accessing 
caml values from C.  I lifted and adapted some code from the 
distribution for building a berkeley DB interface.  In that code, Bp_val 
is used to access the contents of finalized blocks.  I adapted that code 
but shifted to custom blocks, which according to the docs have the same 
layout.  The docs also suggest using Data_custom_val for custom blocks. 
  But when I try to do that, I end up with segfaults.  I'm wondering 
what precisely the difference is.  Here's a snippet of my data type 
definitions and the macros I use for accessing the data contained in the 
custom blocks holding that data:


struct camldb {
   DB *db;
   int closed;
};

struct camltxn {
   DB_TXN *txn;
   int closed;
};

#define UW_db(v) (((struct camldb *)Bp_val(v))->db)
#define UW_db_closed(v) (((struct camldb *)Bp_val(v))->closed)

#define UW_txn(v) (((struct camltxn *)Bp_val(v))->txn)
#define UW_txn_closed(v) (((struct camltxn *)Bp_val(v))->closed)

Anything fishy about that?  And any problem with replacing Bp_val with 
Data_custom_val here?

By the way, in a separate post, I put a URL for where you can download 
the entire wrapper in question.  Here it is again:

    http://minsky-primus.homeip.net/ocaml/bdb.tar.gz

y


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-18 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-18 19:54 Yaron M. Minsky [this message]
     [not found] ` <3D891635.4030002@htec.demon.co.uk>
2002-09-19  1:41   ` Yaron M. Minsky
2002-09-19  2:32     ` Berkeley DB wrapper is fixed (was: Re: [Caml-list] Bp_val and Data_custom_val) Yaron M. Minsky
2002-09-20  9:56 ` [Caml-list] Bp_val and Data_custom_val Xavier Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D88DA09.4010906@cs.cornell.edu \
    --to=yminsky@cs.cornell.edu \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox