From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-3.05: a performance experience
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 14:56:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D4FC792.708E92E@ps.uni-sb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020806111007.52002.qmail@web11207.mail.yahoo.com>
Noel Welsh wrote:
>
> > > I'm intrigued by the relationship between these
> > two parsers.
>
> I wonder if this is related to the difference between
> lazy and strict evaluation.
It is related to implicit data-flow synchronisation via futures (of
which lazy futures are one instance). See:
@article{Halstead:Multilisp,
author = "Robert Halstead",
title = "Multilisp: A Language For Concurrent Symbolic Computation",
journal = "{ACM} Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems",
volume = 7,
number = 4,
pages = "501--538",
year = 1985,
month = oct,
}
@inproceedings{Flanagan+Felleisen:SemanticsOfFuture,
author = "Cormac Flanagan and Matthias Felleisen",
title = "The Semantics of Future and Its Use in Program
Optimizations",
booktitle = "22nd {ACM} {SIGPLAN}-{SIGACT} Symposium on Principles
of Programming Languages (POPL'95)",
address = "San Francisco, California",
pages = "209--220",
year = "1995",
url = "citeseer.nj.nec.com/flanagan95semantics.html"
}
[I believe there is also a more recent journal version of this paper.]
@misc{Niehren+Schwinghammer+Smolka:Futures,
author = {Joachim Niehren and Jan Schwinghammer and Gert Smolka},
title = {Concurrent Computation in a Lambda Calculus with Futures},
institute = {Programming Systems Lab, Universit\"at des Saarlandes},
year = {2002},
month = jun,
note = {Submitted},
url = "http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/Papers/abstracts/lambdafut.html",
}
--
Andreas Rossberg, rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac Man affected us
as kids, we would all be running around in darkened rooms, munching
magic pills, and listening to repetitive electronic music."
- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-06 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-02 3:33 Alexander V. Voinov
2002-08-03 12:33 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-08-03 17:27 ` [Caml-list] OCAMLRUNPARAM=b David Fox
2002-08-04 2:50 ` [Caml-list] ocaml-3.05: a performance experience Alexander V. Voinov
2002-08-04 20:45 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-08-05 15:18 ` John Max Skaller
2002-08-05 16:24 ` Mike Lin
2002-08-05 16:53 ` Alexander V.Voinov
2002-08-06 3:22 ` John Max Skaller
2002-08-06 13:24 ` Mike Lin
2002-08-06 11:10 ` Noel Welsh
2002-08-06 12:56 ` Andreas Rossberg [this message]
2002-08-04 18:06 Damien Doligez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D4FC792.708E92E@ps.uni-sb.de \
--to=rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox