From: Shivkumar Chandrasekaran <shiv@ece.ucsb.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Slow GC problem
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:40:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C821F52-66D5-11D7-A265-000393942C76@ece.ucsb.edu> (raw)
I have a gc efficiency problem for which I require some advice. I have
read both the O'Reilly book and the manual on gc.
I am implementing a fast direct matrix solver for 2D PDEs. So it uses
the Bigarray module a lot. I have two versions of my algorithm. On is
an in-core algorithm and the other is the same solver, except that it
is out-of-core (most of the matrices are stored in disk files).
Unfortunately the out-of-core solver is *faster* than the in-core
solver for the identical problem! I was expecting the out-of-core
solver to be 10 times slower. I am concluding that gc is to blame.
Below I give the gc stats just before and after the solver routine is
called in the in-core solver:
"Just before" "Just after"
minor_words: 46243376 139259767
promoted_words: 928267 2595523
major_words: 2883087 39489766
minor_collections: 1412 4591
major_collections: 18 52
heap_words: 2150400 1044480
heap_chunks: 35 17
top_heap_words: 2150400 5038080
live_words: 1842373 840037
live_blocks: 253926 116816
free_words: 307180 204440
free_blocks: 47368 17
largest_free: 10928 61440
fragments: 847 3
compactions: 0 2
I tried changing some parameters using Gc.set but it did not make a
significant difference. Does anybody see any obvious gc problems from
the above data? Thanks,
--shiv--
PS: I wrote the out-of-core solver in just 3 days once the in-core
solver was done, all in O'Caml. This would have have taken much longer
in Fortran/C. Thanks to the O'Caml team.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-04 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-04 19:40 Shivkumar Chandrasekaran [this message]
2003-04-03 21:07 ` Christophe Raffalli
2003-04-07 17:53 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-04-07 19:08 ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-08 7:15 ` David Monniaux
2003-04-08 10:28 ` Damien Doligez
2003-04-08 23:03 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-04-08 10:23 ` Damien Doligez
2003-04-10 21:21 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-04-10 21:51 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-11 7:10 ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-11 7:58 ` Christophe Raffalli
2003-04-11 16:35 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-04-14 16:37 Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-10-23 8:17 Chris Hecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C821F52-66D5-11D7-A265-000393942C76@ece.ucsb.edu \
--to=shiv@ece.ucsb.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox