From: "Alexander V. Voinov" <avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru>
To: caml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] GC and interoperability with C
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 22:47:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B4D3A02.77361186@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010710094419W.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Hi All,
Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> Either these values are long ints, and you can just copy them, or they
> are pointers, and you just do as I explained.
>
> value my_func(value a, value b)
> {
> value *loca = (value*)malloc(sizeof(value));
> value *locb = (value*)malloc(sizeof(value));
> *loca = a; *locb = b;
> register_global_root(loca);
> register_global_root(locb);
>
> ....
> }
>
> Now you can put loca and locb directly in you C data structure, the
> real data being accessed by *loca, *locb.
>
> Of course, don't forget that you must unregister your global roots
> before freeing loca and locb.
I've played a bit with this, and I have an observation that huge amount
of time is spent on remove_global_root(a).
I will describe the problem, to let you better understand to context. I
have an implementation of B+-tree, with threading, allowing duplicates
and logarithmic access to the item number. Of course it would be fun to
reimplement it in OCaml, but I have enough fun besides this, and enough
serious tasks for which specifically I started to consider OCaml; also,
I'd like to see on this example how much could I get in the interaction
between C and OCaml; next, the module is tested and used for years, and
I see no point to duplicate the work. If successful, I'd like to make it
available for OCaml community.
I store arbitrary OCaml objects in the nodes of the tree, using the
advice quoted above. And I see that the performance of an application is
very different with and without remove_global_root(a). Am I doing
something wrong (besides the very idea of building a complex C
structure, containing lots of OCaml objects; let's assume that the idea
is justified in this or that case)?
Thank you in advance
Alexander
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-12 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-09 4:59 Alexander V. Voinov
2001-07-09 6:59 ` Jacques Garrigue
[not found] ` <3B49C748.9CFB4E6@quasar.ipa.nw.ru>
[not found] ` <20010710094419W.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
2001-07-10 0:46 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2001-07-12 5:47 ` Alexander V. Voinov [this message]
2001-07-12 7:34 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-07-12 15:42 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2001-07-09 22:08 Alexander V. Voinov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B4D3A02.77361186@quasar.ipa.nw.ru \
--to=avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox