Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity

[John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>]

wester@ilt.fhg.de wrote:

> Those who are content with getting by with a small subset of a language
> probably don't like programming and so will not be willing to learn a new
> language.

	I find that a strange comment. I know C++ pretty well,
but I only use a subset of it. Indeed, I claim that this is
_because_ I know it so well. Preferably, the empty subset :-)

	I use a subset of Ocaml for a different reason:
the subset seems adequate for what I need, and I don't
understand some of the higher level constructions well enough
to rely on them. In this case, I'd love to learn more ..
which is why I read this list :-)

-- 
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net
download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr