From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0LCAos0010917
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:10:50 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak4BAGYGOU3RVaE2kGdsb2JhbACWSI4UCBUBAQEBCQkMBxEEIKRQiXuCF4RnLohYAQEDBYVLBIsfgyVsgSE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,358,1291590000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="96183443"
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com ([209.85.161.54])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 21 Jan 2011 13:10:45 +0100
Received: by mail-fx0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 16so1770402fxm.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:10:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer;
        bh=2QEHlB7ZB/g7hdCClkZheC6IDbRLSyurDLwK34NGDUM=;
        b=FYRfLR+zXVoZqQ7lYQwSrHx0W+QRb/2s3VJ/dGCw8oPgQF1dlU6jqEu46SifDqVqxs
         M1hPfbT83Qw5g6aXSUW/EcyQ01e+J1q0xwFXz7SCmLE7a5W3h/exXEp3Gf2mKAHq+kBZ
         bTRlGHsTNrRvKq/mmIpk/1dODkbGp75QbpeRw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id
         :to:mime-version:x-mailer;
        b=nWSR9qslsbCaEveQkpGElMXqtz3y9itNDETb2q/hI5RDnpGmg24i6UeiBoewvqk0K8
         Eg3GBtJIcTPsN2K2MCykme+8cZ5oSVRB2pLH56548VH9MtSYo8p348rg8SaP31tytsXT
         V0zrRfUywCfv9c5wGL3sDLzkhOZfmMmSaixd4=
Received: by 10.223.112.79 with SMTP id v15mr575307fap.143.1295611844943;
        Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([95.60.213.7])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3sm3555000faa.5.2011.01.21.04.10.42
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:10:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:10:40 +0000
Message-Id: <3AED40CA-6D22-40C5-BAC8-D2FE8D9E8611@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [Caml-list] int_of_char vs Char.code

I noticed that cryptokit uses Char.code to convert from char to int.

I also found int_of_char. 

Should I prefer one over another for performance reasons?

	Thanks, Joel

---
http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont