From: Thomas Colcombet <Thomas.Colcombet@irisa.fr>
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] currying...
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 11:22:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AA4BA57.4F9DBA12@irisa.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010306012957.00c7cf00@shell16.ba.best.com>
As I understand the problem, may be the small following examples explain
how CAML
implements curryfication :
# let f = fun x -> (Printf.printf "%d\n" x; fun y -> Printf.printf
"%d\n" y);;
val f : int -> int -> unit = <fun>
# f 1;;
1
- : int -> unit = <fun>
# f 1 2;;
1
2
- : unit = ()
This function does not behave as the following one :
# let f = fun x y -> (Printf.printf "%d\n" x; Printf.printf "%d\n" y);;
val f : int -> int -> unit = <fun>
# f 1;;
- : int -> unit = <fun>
# f 1 2;;
1
2
- : unit = ()
In other words, a fun construct is evaluated only when all its argument
are known.
The notation "let f x y = ..." is just syntactic sugar for "let f = fun
x y -> ...".
Thomas Colcombet
> How does caml know when to call a function? For example, say I have:
>
> val f: int -> int -> int -> unit
>
> and the definition of f is
>
> let f x y = Printf.printf "%d %d" x y;Printf.printf "%d"
>
> so f actually takes two ints, prints them, and then returns a function that takes an int and returns unit. From the val declaration above in a .cmi file, how can caml tell the difference between that f and this one:
>
> let f x y z = Printf.printf "%d %d %d" x y z
>
> How does it know "when" to call f, since you need a different number of parameters for the different definitions? The top f prints x y when it's called with two parms, so it doesn't wait until all three parms have been passed.
>
> I have a feeling I'm missing something fundamental here, or else the definition of a function internally has a field for its arity and it just partially applies until it reaches the total arity. I thought I remembered seeing some documentation on this months ago, but I can't find it now...
>
> It doesn't seem to partially evaluate the function or anything insane like that.
>
> Chris
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-06 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-06 9:39 Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 10:22 ` Thomas Colcombet [this message]
2001-03-06 10:33 ` Bruce Hoult
2001-03-06 10:50 ` Remi VANICAT
2001-03-06 16:31 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-03-06 17:41 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 18:43 ` Sven LUTHER
2001-03-06 19:09 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-06 20:14 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 21:39 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-06 23:23 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 23:45 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-07 1:10 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-07 8:44 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-06 23:51 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 10:16 Adam Granicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AA4BA57.4F9DBA12@irisa.fr \
--to=thomas.colcombet@irisa.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=checker@d6.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox