From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA25877 for caml-red; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:25:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA19426 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:40:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from tequila.cs.yale.edu (tequila.cs.yale.edu [128.36.229.152])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e9HHeLf29084
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:40:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from tequila.cs.yale.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tequila.cs.yale.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA11236
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:40:20 -0400
To: caml-list@inria.fr
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+lists/caml/news/@RUM.CS.YALE.EDU>
Newsgroups: lists.caml
Subject: Re: Seeking pratical tutorial or examples.
References: <200010160046.UAA57403@sanson.reyes.somos.net> <200010160749.JAA21632@pauillac.inria.fr> <4.3.2.7.2.20001016105132.02d96bd0@shell16.ba.best.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.90
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Path: rum.cs.yale.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu
Message-ID: <39ec8eff$1@tequila.cs.yale.edu>
Date: 17 Oct 2000 13:40:15 -0400
X-Trace: 17 Oct 2000 13:40:15 -0400, rum.cs.yale.edu
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com> writes:
> PS.  Should the reply-to header on list messages be set to the list so
> threads don't accidently go private if somebody doesn't reply-all?

Please no.  That makes it a pain when you really want to write a private reply.
The way it is now, you get to chose between "reply sender" and "reply all",
as Emacs intended it to be.


        Stefan

--
I believe in Emacs.