From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA21235 for caml-red; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:12:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA20850 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 15:46:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from post.tepkom.ru (post.tepkom.ru [195.9.10.12])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e71Dkmr19857
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 15:46:49 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by post.tepkom.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA26183
	for caml-list@inria.fr.ANTIVIRUS; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 17:46:42 +0400
Received: from tepkom.ru (young.tepkom.ru [195.19.226.44])
	by post.tepkom.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26168
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 17:46:42 +0400
Message-ID: <3986D4B8.748DDE07@tepkom.ru>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 17:46:32 +0400
From: Dmitri Lomov <dsl@tepkom.ru>
Reply-To: dsl@tepkom.ru
Organization: TEPKOM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Caml mailing list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Different GCs for OCaml
References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000719094927.00aaee20@chasm.org> <20000721165947J.wakita@is.titech.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

By the way, did anybody succesfully applied a different
GC to OCaml?

I've tried to add parallelism -- more specifically, to collect
major heap in a separate thread -- but failed to do so:
as usually with parallel programs, I've got lots of bugs that
were just nightmare to track down.

So, after two weeks of trying, I just abandoned this, with hope
to return to this some day. 

Regards,
Dmitri