From: didier@fecit.fr
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: about partial functions
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 10:21:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <393E0606.7BEB8A78@fecit.fr> (raw)
Hello,
Congratulation for the last version of Ocaml ...
Finally OCaml introduces structural inclusion for variant types ...
---
Actually i develop a functional language with regular types (for XML
data
types introduction)and i try to detect partial functions during the
type checking
pass !
X. Leroy suggests the introduction of these detections during the
compilation
in "The ZINC experiment, an economical implementation of the ML
language"
technical report and this is done during the OCaml pattern matching
compilation
pass ...
Why this is not done during the typing pass ?
. Non conventional type checking rules ?
. Not a task for the type checker because it's a control based on
possible data flows ?
. No structural inclusion for classical variant types ?
Thank you ...
D. Plaindoux
reply other threads:[~2000-06-07 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=393E0606.7BEB8A78@fecit.fr \
--to=didier@fecit.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox