From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA29152 for caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:54:05 +0200 (MET DST) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171854.UAA29152@pauillac.inria.fr> Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA15365 for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:31:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dux.ru (ns.dux.ru [193.125.210.65]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA11283 for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:31:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dux.ru (8.8.8/8.7.6/DUX) with UUCP id WAA19913 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:31:50 +0400 (MSD) Received: (qmail 944 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2000 18:24:49 -0000 Received: from softdnserror (HELO snob.spb.ru) (192.168.200.3) by softdnserror with SMTP; 16 Apr 2000 18:24:49 -0000 Sender: snob@dux.ru Message-ID: <38FA3D9B.3C5920FE@snob.spb.ru> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:24:27 +0000 From: Nickolay Semyonov Organization: ROSLINUX X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [ru] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry? References: <38E7F364.5D24BB7C@motorola.com> <14572.49274.910966.673172@cylinder.csl.sri.com> <38ED71B6.30118608@motorola.com> <14574.1721.508470.790475@cylinder.csl.sri.com> <38F270CF.221F5BD0@motorola.com> <20000411195808.62154@pauillac.inria.fr> <38F3D520.9CD19485@motorola.com> <14581.28385.615880.93928@pc89.lri.fr> <38F5FCFA.2D7F3C3B@maxtal.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-From: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:54:04 +0200 Resent-To: caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr John Max Skaller wrote: > Show me a functional programming language that is as fast > as C++ and I will give up C++. :-) > On what type of applications? Nickolay