From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA01958 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:37:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA13690 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:36:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from front3.grolier.fr (front3.grolier.fr [194.158.96.53]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA07905 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:36:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from club-internet.fr (ppp-99-182.villette.club-internet.fr [194.158.99.182]) by front3.grolier.fr (8.9.3/No_Relay+No_Spam_MGC990224) with ESMTP id KAA03172 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:36:50 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <37C3AE13.FB509D1C@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:49:23 +0200 From: "SURLOG S.A." Reply-To: surlog@club-internet.fr X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Caml List Subject: Interface Ocaml/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: weis Bonjour, Nous avons actuellement des problemes de retour de structures de C vers OCaml. Notre fonction C renvoie une liste de listes de string. Nous bloquons systematiquement lorsque nous dépassons les 600 listes de quelques éléments chacune. Y a-t-il une taille maximum d'allocation Ocaml pour la structure de retour ? Cordialement M. Guesdon -- Surlog S.A. Velizy Plus, Bat. E 1 bis, Rue du Petit Clamart 78140 VELIZY-VILLACOUBLAY Tel: 01-40-83-00-00 Fax: 01-40-83-18-18