From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Static linking with Mingw and dune
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:42:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35BC2556-A54B-4E10-8B76-F667D3F2F719@mpi-sws.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EEEA5F26-2982-429E-A4B8-05E3776ED532@mpi-sws.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3119 bytes --]
[Oops, forgot to check Reply-all.]
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> On 12. Dec 2024, at 18:31, Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@college-de-france.fr> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 8:46 AM Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org <mailto:rossberg@mpi-sws.org>> wrote:
>>> Good to know, thank you for the suggestions!
>>>
>>> However, I’m afraid that hacking the compiler and tool chain for this purpose is not an option — that would require everybody else who wants to build the project to do the same, which is infeasible.
>>>
>>> It’s a bit disappointing that there seems to be no easy solution for this problem. I would expect it to be a common pain point for folks using OCaml 5 to develop and publish application binaries for Windows. Or am I just alien?
>>
>> OCaml's dependency on winpthreads will probably go away in the near future, see https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/13416 .
>
> Ah, that’s good to know!
>
>> But, more generally, static linking of C libraries is getting more and more difficult -- even from C, not just OCaml. For example, under Linux, it's essentially impossible to statically link with the glibc C standard library; a musl-based distribution must be used if static linking is desired. It looks as if the consensus was that static linking of libraries is a bad idea and must be prevented. I don't think it is, but that's something way beyond OCaml's control.
>
> Yeah, acknowledged. It’s sad IMO, as both static and dynamic linking have valid use cases, and ideally should be interchangeable mostly transparently. But maybe I’m having my ML modules hat on.
>
> Cheers,
> /Andreas
>
>
>> Best,
>>
>> - Xavier Leroy
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> /Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 2. Dec 2024, at 09:25, Antonin Décimo <antonin.decimo@gmail.com <mailto:antonin.decimo@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Regarding OCaml 5.3/mingw64 you shouldn't need to have to do anything with libwinpthreads because it's only used for the msvc port, not the mingw one.
>>> >
>>> > That is not quite exact, winpthreads is used with mingw-w64, but found
>>> > in the system installation, and linked to. It is vendored for the MSVC
>>> > port and we *statically* link into the runtime only the parts we're
>>> > interested in.
>>> >
>>> > To statically link with winpthreads, I suggest you do all of it manually:
>>> > - clone winpthreads sources at https://github.com/mingw-w64/mingw-w64,
>>> > go to mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads, and build a static version of
>>> > the library with your preferred toolchain;
>>> >
>>> > - hack the OCaml compiler / Makefile to *not* use `-lpthreads`:
>>> > https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/5a5eb481c7a9d0f039e3169aa8ed19c9b926e982/configure.ac#L2372-L2373
>>> > Maybe it's just sufficient to set PTHREAD_LIBS when invoking
>>> > configure; however seeing this line makes me think that winpthreads is
>>> > already statically linked with the runtime.
>>> >
>>> > PTHREAD_LIBS="-l:libpthread.a $link_gcc_eh"]
>>> >
>>> > Haven't dug further.
>>> >
>>> > -- Antonin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8054 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <EEEA5F26-2982-429E-A4B8-05E3776ED532@mpi-sws.org>
2024-12-13 14:42 ` Andreas Rossberg [this message]
2024-12-01 17:02 Andreas Rossberg
2024-12-01 17:27 ` Kate Deplaix
2024-12-02 8:25 ` Antonin Décimo
2024-12-12 7:44 ` Andreas Rossberg
2024-12-12 17:31 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35BC2556-A54B-4E10-8B76-F667D3F2F719@mpi-sws.org \
--to=rossberg@mpi-sws.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox