From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C397BC28 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:07:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from btr0x1.rz.uni-bayreuth.de (btr0x1.rz.uni-bayreuth.de [132.180.8.29]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iA5I7SRj003645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:07:29 +0100 Received: from btn1x1.inf.uni-bayreuth.de (btn1x1.inf.uni-bayreuth.de [132.180.192.6]) by btr0x1.rz.uni-bayreuth.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA5I7Qwh018756; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:07:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from inf.uni-bayreuth.de (btn1x1.inf.uni-bayreuth.de [132.180.192.6]) by btn1x1.inf.uni-bayreuth.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with SMTP id iA5I7QI0026491; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:07:26 +0100 Received: from pd9543ef5.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.84.62.245]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user wmueller) by btn1x1.inf.uni-bayreuth.de with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:07:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <35177.217.84.62.245.1099678046.squirrel@btn1x1.inf.uni-bayreuth.de> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:07:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Too hard?] Print values like the toplevel's printerI From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_M=FCller?=" To: In-Reply-To: References: <200411051323.13339.wolfgang.mueller2@uni-bayreuth.de> <1065.80.8.0.152.1099661485.squirrel@80.8.0.152> <200411051454.13606.wolfgang.mueller2@uni-bayreuth.de> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 418BC160.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; toplevel's:01 criticizing:01 toplevel:01 cheers:01 muller:01 simpler:01 caml:02 wolfgang:02 wolfgang:02 ugly:03 standard:07 leroy:07 rather:07 mueller:09 think:10 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: > why don't you like this solution ? is it because it is slow ? ugly ? I think your solution gives me the feeling that there must be something simpler than that. This is not criticizing you, it is rather a question to the Caml people, like e.g. X. Leroy and colleagues and/or the ExtLibs: (Why?) is there no really simple way getting the print functionality of the standard toplevel? Cheers, Wolfgang