From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA15499 for caml-redistribution; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 20:12:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA28842 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:04:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from iggy.triode.net.au (iggy.triode.net.au [203.63.235.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA09186 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:04:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from egret (pm1-17.triode.net.au [203.63.235.33]) by iggy.triode.net.au (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA28686 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:58:40 +1000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990813205325.009a5240@mail.triode.net.au> X-Sender: skaller@mail.triode.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:53:25 +1000 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: John Skaller Subject: Order of evaluation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: weis To all those people who explained that the order of evaluation of arguments in ocaml is unspecified and happens to be right to left in my COLON example ... thanks! [Now I have to go away and see where else I made such assumptions :-[ ------------------------------------------------------- John Skaller email: skaller@maxtal.com.au http://www.maxtal.com.au/~skaller phone: 61-2-96600850 snail: 10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe NSW 2037, Australia