From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA08869 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:50:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA12208 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:32:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from iggy.triode.net.au (iggy.triode.net.au [203.63.235.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA18144 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:32:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from egret (pm1-4.triode.net.au [203.63.235.20]) by iggy.triode.net.au (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA02373; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 01:31:58 +1000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990731004233.0098bd60@mail.triode.net.au> X-Sender: skaller@mail.triode.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 00:42:33 +1000 To: STARYNKEVITCH Basile , caml-list@inria.fr From: John Skaller Subject: Re: convincing management to switch to Ocaml In-Reply-To: <14239.6150.864319.797849@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: weis At 16:47 28/07/99 +0200, STARYNKEVITCH Basile wrote: > >Hello, > >Does any one have clues or positive experience about convincing >management to switch to Ocaml? Why switch? Is there some reason not to adopt a more pluralist approach and use both? Try asking your bosses if they always use a screwdriver to nail panels to the wall. :-) ------------------------------------------------------- John Skaller email: skaller@maxtal.com.au http://www.maxtal.com.au/~skaller phone: 61-2-96600850 snail: 10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe NSW 2037, Australia