From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA02355 for caml-redistribution; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 19:56:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA12197 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 15:11:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mx.seanet.com (dns2.seanet.com [199.181.164.2])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA08613
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 15:11:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mmuncher4 (c23.dialup.seanet.com [207.12.129.55]) by mx.seanet.com (8.9.3/Seanet-8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA22993 for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 06:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990419061650.00bb6470@seanet.com>
X-Sender: dwight@seanet.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 06:16:52 -0700
To: caml-list@inria.fr
From: Dwight VandenBerghe <dwight@pentasoft.com>
Subject: License Issues
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: weis

I think the OCaml license is fine as is.  It lets me
use the language freely for commercial purposes.
I don't see what all the hollering is about, unless
the guys on c.l.f want to rip off Inria's work and
call it their own.

Dwight