From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0884C7EF0D for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 02:17:00 +0100 (CET) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:uv13oxyIt68kL5XXCy+O+j09IxM/srCxBDY+r6Qd0eMfIJqq85mqBkHD//Il1AaPBtWErakfwLGM+4nbGkU+or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6anHS+4HYoFwnlMkItf6KuStGU1J/8jLr60qaQSjsLrQL1Wal1IhSyoFeZnegtqqwmFJwMzADUqGBDYeVcyDAgD1uSmxHh+pX4p8Y7oGx48sgs/M9YUKj8Y79wDfkBVGxnYFYO+dbzuBLfYQyK73oaGiVKw1sbSzTCuTj+V5b3+gXgt/F22GHONMn/TLZyVy6j9KxrYBvlmCYJNngy92SB2eJqi6cOiRS9oBo36YffYICTfK53eL/ae9kTTmpAWO5AXixGBcW3aI5ZXLlJBvpRs4So/whGlhC5HwT5Qb62xw== Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=antonbachin@yahoo.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=antonbachin@yahoo.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@nm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of antonbachin@yahoo.com) identity=pra; client-ip=98.138.90.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="antonbachin@yahoo.com"; x-sender="antonbachin@yahoo.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of antonbachin@yahoo.com designates 98.138.90.74 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=98.138.90.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="antonbachin@yahoo.com"; x-sender="antonbachin@yahoo.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@nm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) identity=helo; client-ip=98.138.90.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="antonbachin@yahoo.com"; x-sender="postmaster@nm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B0AADy37tWkUpaimJegi6BXm0QiEuhCoVEilEBDYFmI4VqAoE6OBQBAQEBAQEBARABAQEBBwsLCR8wgi2CFAEBAQMBQAEtCwEECwYFGA0hRRIGExKHcwEDCggOs0WCV4UOASMnA4ROAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDwYMAgGGA4FsCIJChDCDLYEPBYYUDId7iFyFTIJshRkYgg2GfCCFMkSNex4BAYI4DREIgWdLiFMBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0B0AADy37tWkUpaimJegi6BXm0QiEuhCoVEilEBDYFmI4VqAoE6OBQBAQEBAQEBARABAQEBBwsLCR8wgi2CFAEBAQMBQAEtCwEECwYFGA0hRRIGExKHcwEDCggOs0WCV4UOASMnA4ROAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDwYMAgGGA4FsCIJChDCDLYEPBYYUDId7iFyFTIJshRkYgg2GfCCFMkSNex4BAYI4DREIgWdLiFMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,428,1449529200"; d="scan'208";a="164264266" Received: from nm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.74]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 11 Feb 2016 02:16:58 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1455153416; bh=Z9I6BOPmUIn+1pncks2ZmtzCk0kJq99T5y3XuM46dLs=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject; b=EnRzk0gVuSn3GhbRQ0Ba8xtVDP+Yo8ZGqETHR/J7FDFRoly/YPCcGITjXOhwRh7iijdxcWMXP9+AdiQBnFuD0xPLaNwVQhK4apUbPmGV4+16/Koyw8jL0MdpmVT2fV87Kh6yGIt4dH4PTp0SQ1MRU46eKMwZx1DEK4ggDcJFCUMbPR+YrXL14MQCnsBAwSlIFgMJyX7aIaXcn+ffQhdvYpAMdZmhdP7QF1+mlsKcveIoDzHNKohjQhP/GfWfze/yPpsG1662vyx4H/FMsyRY0GWQWXvKI/Zy90Yy5+ZVtWL/likpkzGA0A5brJTBFdMT4GwWXkkoc+jdTfZrk4bL3w== Received: from [98.138.100.116] by nm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Feb 2016 01:16:56 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.41] by tm107.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Feb 2016 01:16:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp109.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Feb 2016 01:16:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 312836.92440.bm@smtp109.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 6kudRNUVM1lyoT3tRGDslHsgyN6Ha6Ur3m3of5Sh256kPl3 Jjy0lTS_bpjwML_XW1W3L5Km20Sl1iVtft15R37qTJnyH6dBr37JrzT.yiEm .na_MdNxGcpXBBgWbWciEclwh9nx8AEbmTXWLglO_eYdLHtKDBvYeWVnSnHL .6pv_2s_VlHJLy4EOpkAxs2eujlBeV1m.ERff2o3uV5q0eM1MNKyViNaIUth mz.BMHBJYmMpjywYNDulF1ZOGc3HBQokEHzdX0UEjBXJ2mkNpXtlKDLFnkYz OBr_rFNuGlu3.6gxsBC8fjqCW6mvucK9hBPaNCa_PrDRyaTFN.1NJ62PvWK3 iWcR2a_UvIF7ufCeTO9t1npN2UTOSwuTGFnaVB3YNFbu1aB82xkucy6OK0L7 VjEOWD.eXCTBZ2qkF6XTdv3sI2wT0pBSFajbA_vxGCxORBbI6JnEmBJwZW3j p_WQuqXUNJT7_Z.t7kPoG4w1OhCBlYSwUJ6rw_KVAlAqoAODadBgDfCv6wsA hMfE_MZ98HzzIkJaauG2Ww6DzFGlGfqk8hXfg6KKkH8U7o4Rt X-Yahoo-SMTP: ddtAESaswBBsjSthz_dVP91gr2NDfymF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Anton Bachin In-Reply-To: <56BBB064.9070505@lexifi.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:16:54 -0600 Cc: Gabriel Scherer , Gerd Stolpmann , caml users X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 476846214.12357-2a48f2e32b6235349cd33af78c592acd Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2CDC8373-FC89-4520-A4AE-B3E711CCE409@yahoo.com> References: <1FE0ECD4-BBD6-48DA-95BD-BB240E07484C@yahoo.com> <1455130851.23513.140.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de> <16829156-57F5-4517-8263-A367BB552732@yahoo.com> <56BBB064.9070505@lexifi.com> To: Alain Frisch X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=5BANN=5D_Bisect=5Fppx_1=2E0=2E0?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?_=96_Modernized_code_coverage_for_OCaml?= Alain, that is a pretty nice suggestion =96 thanks! I=92ve opened an issue = for it: https://github.com/rleonid/bisect_ppx/issues/83 Gerd, are you still working on such projects, as would need these features?= We would consider adding them, but ideally, to remain grounded in reality, it = would be for ongoing, routine usage. It's just easier to get feedback that way and avoid getting ahead of ourselves. Actually, Alain's suggestion may make some such features easier to use. Regards, Anton > On Feb 10, 2016, at 15:49, Alain Frisch wrote: >=20 > On 10/02/2016 20:33, Anton Bachin wrote: >> Assuming this is what Gerd is indeed looking for, I can confirm that >> Bisect_ppx >> still supports it. See >>=20 >> https://github.com/rleonid/bisect_ppx/blob/master/doc/advanced.md#unreac= hable-code >>=20 >> We preferred to document only BISECT_VISIT (which does the same thing), >> in order >> to have only option. But both Bisect_ppx and Bisect support BISECT_MARK = and >> BISECT_VISIT. >=20 >=20 > It's great to see the development of Bisect resurrecting! >=20 >=20 > Did you consider switching to attributes to mark code that must be exclud= ed from the analysis, instead of special comments? This seems simpler than= having to scan again the source files, and it could be more robust when in= teracting with other ppx tools. >=20 > For instance: >=20 >=20 > - Marking a sub-expression, often using the shorthand syntax: >=20 > begin[@bisect.visit] > ... > end >=20 > - Marking a complete function: >=20 >=20 > let f x =3D > ... > [@@bisect.visit] >=20 > or (in OCaml 4.03): >=20 > let[@bisect.visit] f x =3D > ... >=20 > - Marking sections: >=20 >=20 > [@@@bisect.visit.begin] > ... > [@@@bisect.visit.end] >=20 >=20 >=20 > Alain >=20 > --=20 > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs