From: "Luca de Alfaro" <luca@dealfaro.org>
To: "Inria Ocaml Mailing List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Why can't I call a function over a subclass?
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 00:48:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28fa90930710050048p3d6f4e8cs8e13d0fe49d296f2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]
Consider the following sample code, that refuses to type check in Ocaml:
---start---
class r (x_init: int) = object
method get_x : int = x_init
end
let f (r1: r) (r2: r) : bool = (r1#get_x = r2#get_x)
class r' (x_init: int) = object
inherit r x_init
method get_xx : int = 2 * x_init
end
let q (r1: r') (r2: r') = f r1 r2
---end---
r' is a subclass of r. The compiler complains:
File "class1.ml", line 12, characters 28-30:
This expression has type r' but is here used with type r
The second object type has no method get_xx
Now, I know r does not have method get_xx, but why on Earth should this
matter?
I can see that there can be an error if I feed to f something that has FEWER
methods, but why should it be an error to feed to
f something with MORE methods??
The absurdity continues: if I instead declare f as:
let f (r1: <get_x: int; ..>) (r2: <get_x: int; ..>) : bool =
(r1#get_x = r2#get_x)
then the code type-checks. Why is this fine but f: r -> r -> bool causes a
type error?
The situation does not make sense to me. Can someone shed some light on
what is going on?
(This with Ocaml 3.10.0 in case it matters)
Best,
Luca
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1413 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-05 7:48 Luca de Alfaro [this message]
2007-10-05 8:01 ` [Caml-list] " Florian Hars
2007-10-05 8:08 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 8:08 ` Fwd: " Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 11:08 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2007-10-05 11:47 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-05 10:30 ` David Teller
2007-10-05 10:53 ` Zheng Li
2007-10-05 14:02 ` [Caml-list] " David Teller
2007-10-05 14:59 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 15:12 ` Luca de Alfaro
[not found] ` <20071005152130.M41697@cs.unm.edu>
2007-10-05 15:49 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 16:34 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-10-05 17:39 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 17:49 ` Martin Jambon
[not found] ` <28fa90930710052153k2128bb63m5132455868eb2008@mail.gmail.com>
2007-10-07 22:19 ` Martin Jambon
2007-10-07 22:57 ` Classes and polymorphism (Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why can't I call a function over a subclass?) Martin Jambon
2007-10-05 19:48 ` Why can't I call a function over a subclass? Zheng Li
2007-10-06 1:49 ` [Caml-list] " Jake Donham
2007-10-09 4:18 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-10-05 8:07 ` [Caml-list] " Pietro Abate
2007-10-05 10:55 ` Andrej Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28fa90930710050048p3d6f4e8cs8e13d0fe49d296f2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luca@dealfaro.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox