From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9B47EEEF for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:08:50 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AOAQDKQIhVm0pWN0pch2HCVQKCBgEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQgJCwkhLoQjAQEEI1YQCw4MAiYCAkcQBhuIJ7RJlhYBAQEHAQEBAQEdgSGKJIRTMweCaC+BFAWTfZNxD49/hCCDNgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0AOAQDKQIhVm0pWN0pch2HCVQKCBgEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQgJCwkhLoQjAQEEI1YQCw4MAiYCAkcQBhuIJ7RJlhYBAQEHAQEBAQEdgSGKJIRTMweCaC+BFAWTfZNxD49/hCCDNgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,660,1427752800"; d="scan'208";a="166693261" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2015 19:08:32 +0200 Received: from [172.17.24.98] (global-1-18.nat.csx.cam.ac.uk [131.111.184.18]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE4D2150667; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:08:29 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Mark Shinwell Cc: Gerd Stolpmann , Thomas Refis , Damien Doligez , Alan Schmitt , OCaml Mailing List Message-ID: <26F29BF597F2442FAA7222A00A31E615@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: References: <1434982765.31996.19.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de> <1434990659.31996.30.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] use of ";;" when teaching Ocaml Le lundi, 22 juin 2015 =C3=A0 17:47, Mark Shinwell a =C3=A9crit : > In my book, the code of functions shouldn't contain blank lines (I've > found this to often be a good sign that the function is too long > and/or complicated). I agree very much. I became so much accustomed of not having blank lines in= the code of my functions that I find other people's code very hard to foll= ow when they do so (especially tracking the different scopes and/or determi= ning where the functions ends). Daniel