* AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
@ 2006-07-25 15:34 Christoph Bauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Bauer @ 2006-07-25 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom, caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3271 bytes --]
_____
Von: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr
[mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] Im Auftrag von Tom
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 17:21
An: caml-list
Betreff: Re: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
The dirtiest solution:
let to_array t =
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (Obj.magic 0) in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0) ;
a
This is to_array_5 in the table. Dirty and not the fastest. Don't know why.
Maybe a in to_array_1 is keept in a register.
Rate to_array_4 to_array_3 to_array_5 to_array_1b to_array_2
to_array_1
to_array_4 418+-0/s -- -16% -16% -16% -17%
-18%
to_array_3 497+-3/s 19% -- [-0%] [-0%] -1%
-3%
to_array_5 499+-2/s 19% [0%] -- [-0%] -1%
-2%
to_array_1b 499+-2/s 19% [0%] [0%] -- -1%
-2%
to_array_2 504+-2/s 21% 1% 1% 1% --
-1%
to_array_1 511+-2/s 22% 3% 2% 2% 1%
--
Christoph Bauer
(* compile with
ocamlopt -o to_array -I benchmark-0.7 unix.cmxa benchmark-0.7/benchmark.cmx
to_array.ml
*)
open Benchmark
let to_array_1 t =
let dummy = Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found) in
fst
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v (a, i) ->
if i = 0 then
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v) in
(a, 0)
else (a.(i) <- (k, v); (a, i + 1)))
t (dummy, 0))
let to_array_2 t =
let init _ = fun () -> raise Not_found in
let a = Array.init (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (fun () -> (k, v)); i+1) t 0);
Array.map (fun f -> f ()) a
let to_array_3 t =
Array.of_list (Hashtbl.fold (fun a b c -> (a, b) :: c) t [])
let to_array_1b t =
let a = ref (Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found)) in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v i ->
if i = 0 then
(a := Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v);
i)
else
((!a).(i) <- (k, v); i + 1))
t 0);
!a
let to_array_4 t =
let init = ref None in
begin try Hashtbl.iter (fun k v -> init := Some (k,v); raise Exit) t
with Exit -> ()
end;
match !init with
| None -> [| |]
| Some i ->
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) i in
ignore (Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0);
a
let to_array_5 t =
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (Obj.magic 0) in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0) ;
a
let h () =
let h = Hashtbl.create 100000 in
for i = 0 to (Hashtbl.length h) do
Hashtbl.add h (Random.int max_int) (Random.int max_int);
done;
h
let main () =
let h = h () in
let res = throughputN ~repeat:5 1
[ ("to_array_5", to_array_5, h);
("to_array_1", to_array_1, h);
("to_array_1b", to_array_1b, h);
("to_array_2", to_array_2, h);
("to_array_3", to_array_3, h);
("to_array_4", to_array_4, h);
] in
tabulate res
let () = main ()
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10058 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
@ 2006-07-26 14:41 Christoph Bauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Bauer @ 2006-07-26 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4182 bytes --]
_____
Von: Tom [mailto:tom.primozic@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2006 15:53
An: Christoph Bauer
Betreff: Re: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
Once again...
I'm sorry to say that, but I believe that you results are flawed...
Upon inspecting your code with Toploop, I found out some flaws...
let h n =
let m = n * 100000 in
let h = Hashtbl.create m in
for i = 0 to m - 1 do (* <<< not Hashtbl.length h, as it returns 0
for ampty hashtable *)
Hashtbl.replace h (Random.int <http://random.int/> max_int) (
Random.int <http://random.int/> max_int);
done;
h
thanks, sorry for this stupid bug. to_array_5 is now the clear winner.
Christoph Bauer
n=8
Rate to_array_2 to_array_3 to_array_1c to_array_1
to_array_4 to_array_1b to_array_5
to_array_2 34.6+-0.4/s -- -50% -71% -72%
-74% -74% -79%
to_array_3 68.8+-0.6/s 99% -- -42% -45%
-49% -49% -58%
to_array_1c 118+- 2/s 241% 71% -- -6%
-12% -13% -27%
to_array_1 126+- 0/s 264% 83% 7% --
-6% -7% -22%
to_array_4 134+- 2/s 287% 95% 14% 6%
-- [-1%] -17%
to_array_1b 135+- 1/s 290% 96% 15% 7%
[1%] -- -17%
to_array_5 162+- 10/s 369% 136% 37% 29%
21% 20% --
(* compile with
ocamlopt -o to_array -I benchmark-0.7 unix.cmxa benchmark-0.7/benchmark.cmx
to_array.ml
*)
open Benchmark
let to_array_1 t =
let dummy = Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found) in
fst
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v (a, i) ->
if i = 0 then
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v) in
(a, 1)
else (a.(i) <- (k, v); (a, i + 1)))
t (dummy, 0))
let to_array_2 t =
let init _ = fun () -> raise Not_found in
let a = Array.init (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (fun () -> (k, v)); i+1) t 0);
Array.map (fun f -> f ()) a
let to_array_3 t =
Array.of_list (Hashtbl.fold (fun a b c -> (a, b) :: c) t [])
let to_array_1b t =
let a = ref (Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found)) in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v i ->
if i = 0 then
(a := Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v);
1)
else
((!a).(i) <- (k, v); i + 1))
t 0);
!a
let to_array_4 t =
let init = ref None in
begin try Hashtbl.iter (fun k v -> init := Some (k,v); raise Exit) t
with Exit -> ()
end;
match !init with
| None -> [| |]
| Some i ->
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) i in
ignore (Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0);
a
let to_array_5 =
let init = Obj.magic 0 in
fun t ->
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0) ;
a
let to_array_1c t =
let r =
Hashtbl.fold (fun k v seed ->
match seed with
Some (a,i) -> a.(i) <- (k,v); Some (a,i+1)
| None -> let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k,v)
in
Some (a,1))
t None
in
match r with
None -> Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found)
| Some (a, _) -> a
let h n =
let m = n * 1000 in
let h = Hashtbl.create m in
for i = 0 to m - 1 do
Hashtbl.replace h (Random.int max_int) (Random.int max_int);
done;
h
let main () =
let n = try int_of_string Sys.argv.(1) with _ -> 1 in
let h = h n in
let res = throughputN ~repeat:5 1
[("to_array_1", to_array_1, h);
("to_array_1b", to_array_1b, h);
("to_array_1c", to_array_1c, h);
("to_array_2", to_array_2, h);
("to_array_3", to_array_3, h);
("to_array_4", to_array_4, h);
("to_array_5", to_array_5, h);
] in
tabulate res
let () = main ()
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12793 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
2006-07-25 12:44 Christoph Bauer
@ 2006-07-26 9:46 ` Damien Doligez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Doligez @ 2006-07-26 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
On 2006-07-25, at 14:44, Christoph Bauer wrote:
>>
>> let to_array_4 t =
>> let init = ref None in
>> begin try Hashtbl.iter (fun k v -> init := Some (k,v);
>> raise Exit) t
>
> My guess: hashtbl has to loop over the first empty buckets.
> And this eats the cpu cycles.
I guess that's correct, since you're doing your tests with a
100000-sized hash table that contains only one entry. I wouldn't
call that a typical case.
-- Damien
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
@ 2006-07-26 9:29 Christoph Bauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Bauer @ 2006-07-26 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
>
> let to_array9 t =
> let Some (a,_) =
> Hashtbl.fold (fun k v seed ->
> match seed with
> Some (a,i) -> a.(i) <- (k,v); Some (a,i+1)
> | None -> let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k,v) in
> Some (a,1))
> t None
> in a
> ;;
I called this to_array_1c. The hashtable is initialized with n * 100,000
elements, where n is n = 1, 2, 4, 8. Here the results. n = 8 is a good
summary.
n = 1
Rate to_array_4 to_array_1c to_array_3 to_array_2
to_array_1b to_array_5 to_array_1
to_array_4 413+-1/s -- -17% -17% -18%
-18% -19% -19%
to_array_1c 498+-2/s 21% -- [-0%] -1%
-1% -2% -3%
to_array_3 500+-3/s 21% [0%] -- [-0%]
[-0%] -2% -2%
to_array_2 502+-2/s 21% 1% [0%] --
[-0%] -1% -2%
to_array_1b 502+-2/s 21% 1% [0%] [0%]
-- -1% -2%
to_array_5 509+-2/s 23% 2% 2% 1%
1% -- [-1%]
to_array_1 512+-2/s 24% 3% 2% 2%
2% [1%] --
n = 2
Rate to_array_4 to_array_2 to_array_3 to_array_1c to_array_1b
to_array_1 to_array_5
to_array_4 203+-1/s -- -7% -7% -8%
-8% -8% -8%
to_array_2 218+-1/s 8% -- [-0%] [-0%]
[-0%] [-1%] -1%
to_array_3 218+-1/s 8% [0%] -- [-0%]
[-0%] [-1%] -1%
to_array_1c 219+-1/s 8% [0%] [0%] --
[-0%] [-0%] [-1%]
to_array_1b 219+-1/s 8% [0%] [0%] [0%]
-- [-0%] -1%
to_array_1 220+-1/s 8% [1%] [1%] [0%]
[0%] -- [-1%]
to_array_5 221+-1/s 9% 1% 1% [1%]
1% [1%] --
n = 4
Rate to_array_4 to_array_2 to_array_1c to_array_1b
to_array_1 to_array_3 to_array_5
to_array_4 64.7+-0.3/s -- -34% -34% -35%
-35% -35% -35%
to_array_2 98.4+-0.6/s 52% -- [-0%] [-1%]
[-1%] -1% -1%
to_array_1c 98.7+-0.4/s 52% [0%] -- [-0%]
[-1%] -1% -1%
to_array_1b 99.0+-0.0/s 53% [1%] [0%] --
[-0%] -1% -1%
to_array_1 99.4+-0.7/s 54% [1%] [1%] [0%]
-- [-0%] [-0%]
to_array_3 99.6+-0.4/s 54% 1% 1% 1%
[0%] -- [-0%]
to_array_5 99.8+-0.4/s 54% 1% 1% 1%
[0%] [0%] --
n = 8
Rate to_array_4 to_array_5 to_array_3 to_array_2
to_array_1 to_array_1b to_array_1c
to_array_4 38.8+-0.2/s -- -20% -20% -21%
-21% -21% -21%
to_array_5 48.7+-0.3/s 26% -- [-0%] [-0%]
[-0%] [-0%] [-0%]
to_array_3 48.7+-0.2/s 26% [0%] -- [-0%]
[-0%] [-0%] [-0%]
to_array_2 48.8+-0.2/s 26% [0%] [0%] --
[-0%] [-0%] [-0%]
to_array_1 48.8+-0.2/s 26% [0%] [0%] [0%]
-- [-0%] [-0%]
to_array_1b 48.9+-0.2/s 26% [0%] [0%] [0%]
[0%] -- [-0%]
to_array_1c 48.9+-0.2/s 26% [0%] [0%] [0%]
[0%] [0%] --
(* compile with
ocamlopt -o to_array -I benchmark-0.7 unix.cmxa benchmark-0.7/benchmark.cmx
to_array.ml
*)
open Benchmark
let to_array_1 t =
let dummy = Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found) in
fst
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v (a, i) ->
if i = 0 then
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v) in
(a, 1)
else (a.(i) <- (k, v); (a, i + 1)))
t (dummy, 0))
let to_array_2 t =
let init _ = fun () -> raise Not_found in
let a = Array.init (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (fun () -> (k, v)); i+1) t 0);
Array.map (fun f -> f ()) a
let to_array_3 t =
Array.of_list (Hashtbl.fold (fun a b c -> (a, b) :: c) t [])
let to_array_1b t =
let a = ref (Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found)) in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v i ->
if i = 0 then
(a := Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v);
i)
else
((!a).(i) <- (k, v); i + 1))
t 0);
!a
let to_array_4 t =
let init = ref None in
begin try Hashtbl.iter (fun k v -> init := Some (k,v); raise Exit) t
with Exit -> ()
end;
match !init with
| None -> [| |]
| Some i ->
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) i in
ignore (Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0);
a
let to_array_5 =
let init = Obj.magic 0 in
fun t ->
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0) ;
a
let to_array_1c t =
let r =
Hashtbl.fold (fun k v seed ->
match seed with
Some (a,i) -> a.(i) <- (k,v); Some (a,i+1)
| None -> let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k,v)
in
Some (a,1))
t None
in
match r with
None -> Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found)
| Some (a, _) -> a
let h n =
let h = Hashtbl.create (n*100000) in
for i = 0 to (Hashtbl.length h) do
Hashtbl.replace h (Random.int max_int) (Random.int max_int);
done;
h
let main () =
let n = try int_of_string Sys.argv.(1) with _ -> 1 in
let h = h n in
let res = throughputN ~repeat:5 1
[("to_array_1", to_array_1, h);
("to_array_1b", to_array_1b, h);
("to_array_1c", to_array_1c, h);
("to_array_2", to_array_2, h);
("to_array_3", to_array_3, h);
("to_array_4", to_array_4, h);
("to_array_5", to_array_5, h);
] in
tabulate res
let () = main ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
2006-07-25 15:53 AW: " Christoph Bauer
@ 2006-07-25 16:35 ` Tom
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tom @ 2006-07-25 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Bauer; +Cc: Brian Hurt, caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1361 bytes --]
I'm sorry to say that, but I believe that you results are flawed...
If we look at the code of to_array_1 and to_array_5, there is no possibility
that the former was faster... if nothing else, it has an additional if jump
each and every loop. I simply couldn't believe your results.
Upon inspecting your code with Toploop, I found out some flaws...
let h () =
let h = Hashtbl.create 100000 in
for i = 0 to 99999 do (* <<< not Hashtbl.length h, as it
returns 0 for ampty hashtable *)
Hashtbl.add h (Random.int max_int) (Random.int max_int);
done;
h
let to_array_1 t =
let dummy = Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found) in
fst
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v (a, i) ->
if i = 0 then
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v) in
(a, 1) (* <<<<< Not 0, as it causes no progress *)
else (a.(i) <- (k, v); (a, i + 1)))
t (dummy, 0))
I also corrected my implementation:
let mgc = Obj.magic 0 <<< So that the function is executed only once.
let to_array_5 t =
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) mgc in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i + 1) t 0) ;
a
I tried to do some benchmarking, but I do not have much time... anyhow, my
implementation is faster as far as I tested it.
Believe in your dreams!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2241 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
@ 2006-07-25 12:44 Christoph Bauer
2006-07-26 9:46 ` Damien Doligez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Bauer @ 2006-07-25 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
>
> let to_array_4 t =
> let init = ref None in
> begin try Hashtbl.iter (fun k v -> init := Some (k,v);
> raise Exit) t
My guess: hashtbl has to loop over the first empty buckets.
And this eats the cpu cycles.
> with Exit -> ()
> end;
> match !init with
> | None -> [| |]
> | Some i ->
> let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) i in
> ignore (Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (k, v); i
> + 1) t 0);
> a
Regards,
Christoph Bauer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
2006-07-25 10:19 Christoph Bauer
@ 2006-07-25 10:45 ` skaller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: skaller @ 2006-07-25 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Bauer; +Cc: Erick Tryzelaar, caml-list
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 12:19 +0200, Christoph Bauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > You could also try inverting the Hashtbl fold into an
> > iterator+closure and pass the closure into the Array.init
> > function, but I'm not sure how complicated/efficient that would be.
>
> Something like:
>
> let to_array_2 t =
> let init _ = fun () -> raise Not_found in
> let a = Array.init (Hashtbl.length t) init in
> ignore
> (Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (fun () -> (k, v)); i+1) t 0);
> Array.map (fun f -> f ()) a
ugg .. really need a variable length array here. However the most
efficient solution is:
(1) Use Hashtbl.iter to capture just one value out of the
Hashtble:
let get1 h =
Hashtbl.iter (fun k v -> raise XSome (k,v)) h;
raise XNone
in
(2) Initialise the array with it:
let a = try get1 h with
| XSome x -> Array.init (Hashtbl.length h) x
| XNone -> raise Not_found (* zero length array? *)
in
(3) Now use Hashtbl.fold or iter to initialise the array.
This 'costs' a write barrier but there is no additional
data structure required, and the whole thing is quite safe.
This leaves open the problem of making a zero length array
of the correct type.. not a problem if you're writing
the code inside the Hashtbl module, but trickier if you're
doing it outside.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array
@ 2006-07-25 10:19 Christoph Bauer
2006-07-25 10:45 ` skaller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Bauer @ 2006-07-25 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erick Tryzelaar, Christoph Bauer; +Cc: caml-list
Hi,
>
> You could also try inverting the Hashtbl fold into an
> iterator+closure and pass the closure into the Array.init
> function, but I'm not sure how complicated/efficient that would be.
Something like:
let to_array_2 t =
let init _ = fun () -> raise Not_found in
let a = Array.init (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (fun () -> (k, v)); i+1) t 0);
Array.map (fun f -> f ()) a
>
> I suppose it just depends on how efficient you need it to be.
> If it's just some simple stuff, I'd just use the intermediary list.
benchmarking shows, that all three approaches are similar
with respect to efficiency.
Regards,
Christoph Bauer
Benchmark:
Throughputs for to_array_1, to_array_2, to_array_3, each running 5 times for
at least 1 CPU seconds:
to_array_1: 1 WALL ( 1.14 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.14 CPU) @ 491.23/s (n=560)
1 WALL ( 1.14 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.14 CPU) @ 491.23/s (n=560)
2 WALL ( 1.14 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.14 CPU) @ 491.23/s (n=560)
1 WALL ( 1.15 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.15 CPU) @ 486.96/s (n=560)
1 WALL ( 1.15 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.15 CPU) @ 486.96/s (n=560)
to_array_2: 1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
2 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
to_array_3: 1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
1 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
2 WALL ( 1.07 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.07 CPU) @ 482.24/s (n=516)
Rate to_array_2 to_array_3 to_array_1
to_array_2 482/s -- [-0%] -1%
to_array_3 482+-0/s [0%] -- -1%
to_array_1 490+-2/s 2% 2% --
open Benchmark
let to_array_1 t =
let dummy = Array.init 0 (fun _ -> raise Not_found) in
fst
(Hashtbl.fold
(fun k v (a, i) ->
if i = 0 then
let a = Array.make (Hashtbl.length t) (k, v) in
(a, 0)
else (a.(i) <- (k, v); (a, i + 1)))
t (dummy, 0))
let to_array_2 t =
let init _ = fun () -> raise Not_found in
let a = Array.init (Hashtbl.length t) init in
ignore
(Hashtbl.fold (fun k v i -> a.(i) <- (fun () -> (k, v)); i+1) t 0);
Array.map (fun f -> f ()) a
let to_array_3 t =
Array.of_list (Hashtbl.fold (fun a b c -> (a, b) :: c) t [])
let h () =
let h = Hashtbl.create 100000 in
for i = 0 to (Hashtbl.length h) do
Hashtbl.add h (Random.int max_int) (Random.int max_int);
done;
h
let main () =
let h = h () in
let res = throughputN ~repeat:5 1
[("to_array_1", to_array_1, h);
("to_array_2", to_array_2, h);
("to_array_3", to_array_3, h); ] in
tabulate res
let () = main ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-26 14:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-25 15:34 AW: [Caml-list] generic Hashtbl.to_array Christoph Bauer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-26 14:41 Christoph Bauer
2006-07-26 9:29 Christoph Bauer
2006-07-25 15:53 AW: " Christoph Bauer
2006-07-25 16:35 ` Tom
2006-07-25 12:44 Christoph Bauer
2006-07-26 9:46 ` Damien Doligez
2006-07-25 10:19 Christoph Bauer
2006-07-25 10:45 ` skaller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox