From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474467F890 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:13:02 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.126.187; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com"; x-sender="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.126.187; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com"; x-sender="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@moutng.kundenserver.de designates 212.227.126.187 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=212.227.126.187; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com"; x-sender="postmaster@moutng.kundenserver.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYCAIGZMlPU4367lGdsb2JhbABZg0HDTYEaFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgiUBAQEDATo/BQsLIRUQDwFHiAoMz0oXiSiFSQcWhCIEmgCFFY1bgT8 X-IPAS-Result: AgYCAIGZMlPU4367lGdsb2JhbABZg0HDTYEaFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgiUBAQEDATo/BQsLIRUQDwFHiAoMz0oXiSiFSQcWhCIEmgCFFY1bgT8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,734,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="64790599" Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 26 Mar 2014 10:13:01 +0100 Received: from agaric.localnet (jua06-3-88-189-115-104.fbx.proxad.net [88.189.115.104]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue007) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LywdQ-1X6Hn82Qdc-0149qh; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:12:58 +0100 From: Louis Gesbert To: platform@lists.ocaml.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Bobot , caml-list@inria.fr Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:12:56 +0100 Message-ID: <2026824.u9EsF9KS0J@agaric> Organization: OCamlPro User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.13-1-amd64; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <53329725.90602@cea.fr> References: <53329725.90602@cea.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:IMUKHRAm19S02aZ4vR85JtAF8VucCW3vkHL/k8FqD22 /141tM2Z6Hk+P6Lp6fRDN3aBW6SdkCKqH9ohPEOgB1Oo3fBTan vQ8LS7EF/CCsNQtIyTPa806mBTL5Eo7DR/Qmpe6yhWwoqJwYzx JACF5/dvWnbpCbGByk5Pq+92X2cYe0ay478i/AqtdbgxLShjtk fX4JBw+LccpG4Clsxi1IufQgdcB8y0/Y8N98I4KO4FIbfXtxsV kYRZcwekO8fGUxUzudBapharVRga9Kc84mOBUkywydlOvLee34 9NTolyILalL3AeUC8VYYEv+XPrJry3ebetRjWCH5tG+knqFlyp bBcELV7aVFh7PKFzNEfo= X-Validation-by: louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ocaml-platform] [ANN] Experiment: OCaml patch review on github.com/ocaml/ocaml Thanks Anil ! > It is awfully useful. I was trying to setup an OPAM repository for simplifying the review of PR#22, > but you did it for me and all the others, thank you. > > I'm just wondering if it is wise to add all these switches to the default OPAM repository. For > casual ocaml user the useful switches are lost among all these PR. > > Perhaps the default possible switches can be reduced to the last releases (for people that work on > project that must support old version of ocaml) and to the beta and trunk for people that are > curious of the accepted new features. That's why in OPAM 1.1.1 we changed `opam switch list` to only display the default compilers, and you need to add `--all` to see all existing compiler descriptions. I think it's enough to address your concern. But that doesn't prevent a specific repo of course.