From: Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] expansion of #use?
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:34:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519093406.GA55524@pllab.is.ocha.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518113203.GA26442@pllab.is.ocha.ac.jp>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2142 bytes --]
I tried to implement it myself, using compiler-libs (based on OCaml
4.11.0-alpha1 that I happen to install recently):
https://github.com/kenichi-asai/remove-sharpuse
It can be installed via:
opam pin add remove-sharpuse https://github.com/kenichi-asai/remove-sharpuse.git
However, if I execute (with attached a.ml and b.ml):
$ remove-sharpuse -dsource b.ml
Fatal error: exception Invalid_argument("The ocamltoplevel.cma library from compiler-libs cannot be loaded inside the OCaml toplevel")
What I did is as follows:
- I copied topstart.ml from toplevel/topstart.ml and modified it so
that it calls My_topmain.main() instead of Topmain.main().
- I copied my_topmain.ml from toplevel/topmain.ml and modified all the
occurences of Toploop to My_toploop.
- I copied my_toploop.ml from toplevel/toploop.ml and modified
execute_phrase so that it does not execute Ptop_def case. That is,
I inserted "if true then true else" at line 273:
https://github.com/kenichi-asai/remove-sharpuse/blob/4.11.0-alpha1/my_toploop.ml#L273
so that Ptop_def case is ignored.
If I insert the "if true then true else" line manually into the OCaml
source and compile it via "make world", I can expand #use by passing
"-dsource" to the resulting ocaml. Can I do the same using
compiler-libs without getting the above error?
Thank you in advance.
--
Kenichi Asai
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:32:03PM +0900,
Kenichi Asai wrote:
> Is there any way to expand the use of #use? Suppose I have the
> following two files:
>
> a.ml:
> let a = 3
>
> b.ml:
> #use "a.ml";;
> print_int a
>
> Given the file name b.ml, I want to obtain:
>
> let a = 3 ;;
> print_int a
>
> The -dsource option of ocaml almost does it, but it executes the
> program at the same time. In the above program, it prints 3, too.
>
> So far, I tweak into the OCaml implementation, turn off the execution
> in execute_phrase in toploop.ml, and re-compile whole the OCaml. I
> wonder if I can do the same thing simpler than this, possibly using
> compiler libs?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> PS. I know I should not use #use from the first place.
>
> --
> Kenichi Asai
[-- Attachment #2: a.ml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 14 bytes --]
let a = 1 + 2
[-- Attachment #3: b.ml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 52 bytes --]
let b = 5;;
#use "a.ml";;
let _ = print_int (a + b)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 11:32 Kenichi Asai
2020-05-19 9:34 ` Kenichi Asai [this message]
2020-05-22 5:50 ` Kenichi Asai
2020-05-23 11:00 ` orbifx
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519093406.GA55524@pllab.is.ocha.ac.jp \
--to=asai@is.ocha.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox