From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0687F3B1 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:01:19 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=itz@very.loosely.org; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=root@very.loosely.org; spf=Pass smtp.helo=postmaster@very.loosely.org Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of itz@very.loosely.org) identity=pra; client-ip=173.255.215.69; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="root@very.loosely.org"; x-sender="itz@very.loosely.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of root@very.loosely.org designates 173.255.215.69 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=173.255.215.69; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="root@very.loosely.org"; x-sender="root@very.loosely.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@very.loosely.org designates 173.255.215.69 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=173.255.215.69; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="root@very.loosely.org"; x-sender="postmaster@very.loosely.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AzHEv2hNR9WJotS4kkWkl6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIM?= =?us-ascii?q?zox0K/nzrarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsK0UzbeO+4nbGkU+or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe?= =?us-ascii?q?43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6a8TWO6msZExD7cA50?= =?us-ascii?q?PfjdG4jIjs3x2frh1YfUZlBpjTz1U7J3KRisqAzX/p0XnZlKNKsr213NpXxTdu?= =?us-ascii?q?BHg2RyKgTAzF7H+s6s8cs7oGxrsPU7+psYCPSoT+EDVbVdSQ8eHSUw7czvuwPE?= =?us-ascii?q?SFLftGURSHRQlh1PGAXB/Vf9RJij63Kn5No44zGTOIjNdZ5xWTmm6P47GgHlkj?= =?us-ascii?q?ZBMzk+62zTm4p3lq0J+Uv99Sw6+JbdZcSuDNQ7ZrnUJINIW2dbT4BVUCtaD4et?= =?us-ascii?q?KYwVALhZMA=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BKCwCkEnVe/0XX/61mHgELHIQkLYEUM?= =?us-ascii?q?o1EhgROAwEBAQUBgTMBAxSJZIUmEoweAQMBDCwBAgQBAYZqHQYBBDQTAhABAQU?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQECAQIDBAFshWKCOyKDBwEEATpECwshJQ9IhhcFIAWuVIkagT6BOIwvGnmBB?= =?us-ascii?q?4QlPoUYhSIEmDqYDYJGlnIpDoIsAZkaix6feoFpIoFYTTAIgyhPGA2dBSEDgTY?= =?us-ascii?q?BAYtHLIIUAwEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BKCwCkEnVe/0XX/61mHgELHIQkLYEUMo1EhgROAwEBAQU?= =?us-ascii?q?BgTMBAxSJZIUmEoweAQMBDCwBAgQBAYZqHQYBBDQTAhABAQUBAQECAQIDBAFsh?= =?us-ascii?q?WKCOyKDBwEEATpECwshJQ9IhhcFIAWuVIkagT6BOIwvGnmBB4QlPoUYhSIEmDq?= =?us-ascii?q?YDYJGlnIpDoIsAZkaix6feoFpIoFYTTAIgyhPGA2dBSEDgTYBAYtHLIIUAwEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,285,1580770800"; d="scan'208";a="343115825" X-MGA-submission: =?us-ascii?q?MDGtlRs3wYjcoFaLogqBoFJF5z3hDCPCWgyX6S?= =?us-ascii?q?gngGQLJwdlxcdiC2cVlwjP3gcuX4zpggDvmqtaAqGe/D18IeZCMaho0O?= =?us-ascii?q?gC4ZqNhA4L022cEUuLNlQwPNgqajmrhuVtbsXpenXrLrX2SY9Gm1DniQ?= =?us-ascii?q?RX4ZqpceCqeyV+S0v4nDuWJg=3D=3D?= Received: from very.loosely.org ([173.255.215.69]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2020 20:01:14 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45846 helo=foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93.0.4-235-17b623c0b) (envelope-from ) id 1jFMtL-0001A0-IX for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:01:11 -0700 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:01:02 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20200320190102.p3hm6fpuo66yr6ve@matica> References: <20200319194406.fd234fbnnqowt34b@matica> <20200319202507.xukj4fxwsk72a6gp@matica> <141a6cef-ee6e-9bb3-9397-18c69c343a02@polychoron.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <141a6cef-ee6e-9bb3-9397-18c69c343a02@polychoron.fr> X-Loosely-ASN: 4294967295 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] cannot create new opam switches On 2020-03-20 17:05, Florian Angeletti wrote: > However, I am wondering how badly is the issue affecting you? Is it > just a matter of setting AWKPATH to an "unsafe" "." value temporarily, > or you just cannot install recent version of OCaml until the issue is > fixed? Thanks for asking, yes I just run opam with a local AWKPATH, installed 4.09 already. No problem. Good to know that it's being addressed. -- Ian