From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@very.loosely.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ReasonML concrete syntax
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:13:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171217201356.djjygim6oelagvt6@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPzAKVCQjC6zWoNhduZSpgzTJm7haPz=UCbzuC3CR+QbSqJObQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2017-12-17 17:55, Paolo Donadeo wrote:
> So, actually, why caring about the syntax of another language?
Because, being backed by FB, Reason will _become_ the normal Ocaml, and
even those who dislike it will in practice be forced to use it. That is
the core of this disagreement.
> Honestly I don't understand this argument. Someone out there created
> another (concrete) syntax for OCaml. If you like it use it otherwise
> let them alone.
But _you_ won't be "let alone" for long.
> My point was that there is a huge difference between "I don't like
> ReasonML syntax" and "ReasonML users are idiots".
Yes, I agree. I'm completely with the former, but I never said the
latter nor do I support it. Nonetheless there are many people who are
no idiots but whose choices I reflexively reject. (My first post in
this thread provides some context.)
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-17 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-10 18:12 Robert Muller
2017-12-11 0:09 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-11 5:50 ` Viet Le
2017-12-11 6:45 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-11 6:53 ` Sven SAULEAU
2017-12-11 6:50 ` Sven SAULEAU
2017-12-11 6:54 ` Evgeny Khramtsov
2017-12-11 7:22 ` =?gb18030?B?Qm9i?=
2017-12-11 7:16 ` Evgeny Khramtsov
2017-12-17 15:02 ` Paolo Donadeo
2017-12-17 16:01 ` Guillaume Huysmans
2017-12-17 16:55 ` Paolo Donadeo
2017-12-17 20:13 ` Ian Zimmerman [this message]
2017-12-17 20:49 ` Robert Muller
2017-12-18 1:34 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-18 16:36 ` Evgeny Khramtsov
2017-12-18 17:00 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2017-12-18 17:27 ` Gary Trakhman
2017-12-18 17:53 ` Evgeny Khramtsov
2017-12-18 2:14 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-11 15:51 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-11 16:07 ` Sven SAULEAU
2017-12-11 17:11 ` David Brown
2017-12-12 3:49 ` Louis Roché
2017-12-12 4:18 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-12 5:52 ` Oliver Bandel
2017-12-11 14:40 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2017-12-11 16:10 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-11 16:47 ` Viet Le
2017-12-11 17:10 ` Yotam Barnoy
2017-12-11 18:56 ` Robert Muller
2017-12-11 19:23 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-11 21:10 ` Marshall
2017-12-11 17:29 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-11 17:59 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-11 18:30 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2017-12-13 8:22 ` Sebastien Ferre
2017-12-13 9:26 ` Evgeny Khramtsov
2017-12-13 10:37 ` David Allsopp
2017-12-13 16:38 ` Marshall
2017-12-13 16:44 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-13 17:20 ` David Allsopp
2017-12-13 17:51 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-13 17:39 ` Hendrik Boom
2017-12-13 17:55 ` Robert Muller
2017-12-13 18:19 ` Viet Le
2017-12-13 19:29 ` Yawar Amin
2017-12-13 8:55 ` Nicolas Boulay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171217201356.djjygim6oelagvt6@matica.foolinux.mooo.com \
--to=itz@very.loosely.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox