From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1837EE35
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun,  1 May 2016 16:01:10 +0200 (CEST)
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:k7VI5xRvGzo6XK0v21RRp8/ybNpsv+yvbD5Q0YIujvd0So/mwa64ZxyN2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4/CmCT1Lv8nJmUtBWaIPfidNsd8RkQ0kDZzNImzAB9muURYHGt9fXkRu5XCxPBsdMs//Y1rPvi/6tmZKSV3BPAZ4bt74BpTVx5zukbviq9uDMk4W23KUWvBbElaflU3prM4YgI9veO4a6yDihT92QdlQ3n5iPlmJnhzxtY+a9Z9n9DlM6bp6r5YTGfayQ6NtRrVdCHEiMnspzMztrxjKCwWVtVUGVWBDtxNODRLI4FneWYvj+n//v+xzwiSWe8nxUaIcUC6p6L0tRBK+23RPDCIw7GyC0p84t6lcuh/0/xE=
Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=manfred.lotz@arcor.de; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org; spf=Pass smtp.helo=postmaster@plane.gmane.org
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  manfred.lotz@arcor.de) identity=pra; client-ip=80.91.229.3;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org";
  x-sender="manfred.lotz@arcor.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.91.229.3;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org";
  x-sender="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@plane.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=80.91.229.3;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@plane.gmane.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BfAQAzCyZXcQPlW1BehAt9uXYBDYIUhw44FAEBAQEBAQEBEQEXMy+CLYIVAQQBOkQLCyElDy4aGYgUAQMKDAEJvjACSAWEfASGIYRMgkGCSIUKBZgUgVWEJ4gSCoFRh2WFW48xHgEBgXgBC4IraodlAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A0BfAQAzCyZXcQPlW1BehAt9uXYBDYIUhw44FAEBAQEBAQEBEQEXMy+CLYIVAQQBOkQLCyElDy4aGYgUAQMKDAEJvjACSAWEfASGIYRMgkGCSIUKBZgUgVWEJ4gSCoFRh2WFW48xHgEBgXgBC4IraodlAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,562,1454972400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="216519025"
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 01 May 2016 16:01:09 +0200
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1awrvo-00039t-D2
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:01:08 +0200
Received: from p4fff3743.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.255.55.67])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:01:08 +0200
Received: from manfred.lotz by p4fff3743.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:01:08 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: caml-list@inria.fr
From: Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@arcor.de>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 15:35:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20160501153543.4b5efbcb@arcor.com>
References: <20160403124655.GS24122@carty.lan>
	<20160430221448.0b0f487c@arcor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4fff3743.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] qtest 2.2, merged with qcheck

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 22:14:48 +0200
Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@arcor.de> wrote:

> Hi Simon,
> Just started to play with qtest and when trying out things from here
>         https://github.com/vincent-hugot/iTeML
> I got a an error saying that qcheck wasn't installed.
> 
> No prob, I installed qcheck and all was fine.
> 
> Question: Shouldn't  qtest 2.2 have a dependency for qcheck in the
> opam package?
> 

Just for the records. Somehow I mixed up things. 

Indeet, in qtest 2.2 the qcheck package is a part of qtest, and trying
to install qcheck gives a conflict. 

So all is fine, and sorry for the noise.

-- 
Manfred