From: ygrek <ygrek@autistici.org>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] When to (not) use -no-naked-pointers?
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 19:40:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150704194027.1e7cd196@kiwi.local.tld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150526102146.721d236c@kiwi.local.tld>
On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:21:46 -0700
ygrek <ygrek@autistici.org> wrote:
> I wonder if there is a C define in caml runtime headers to test for this configuration feature?
> Because naturally the bindings author knows whether his code is compatible with this mode or not
> and could assert that during the build..
Answering my own question, NO_NAKED_POINTERS will be defined in config.h if this feature is enabled.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-05 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-25 6:25 Jez
2015-05-25 21:49 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2015-05-26 15:42 ` Mark Shinwell
2015-05-26 17:21 ` ygrek
2015-07-05 2:40 ` ygrek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150704194027.1e7cd196@kiwi.local.tld \
--to=ygrek@autistici.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox