From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBF77F7C2 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:55:49 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of rich@annexia.org) identity=pra; client-ip=80.68.91.176; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="rich@annexia.org"; x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of rich@annexia.org designates 80.68.91.176 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.68.91.176; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="rich@annexia.org"; x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org) identity=helo; client-ip=80.68.91.176; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="rich@annexia.org"; x-sender="postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoFANuSAlNQRFuw/2dsb2JhbABZgwY4gxq9B4EZFnSCJQEBBTo0CxALGAkTEg8FKCGIHAEIyjsTBIYViGwHgySBFASYK5Ikgy08 X-IPAS-Result: AhoFANuSAlNQRFuw/2dsb2JhbABZgwY4gxq9B4EZFnSCJQEBBTo0CxALGAkTEg8FKCGIHAEIyjsTBIYViGwHgySBFASYK5Ikgy08 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,863,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="49423795" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 17 Feb 2014 23:55:47 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFX65-0001QS-5Y; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:55:33 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:55:33 +0000 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: Kakadu Cc: Thomas Refis , Gabriel Scherer , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli?= , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Bobot , caml users Message-ID: <20140217225532.GA18492@annexia.org> References: <20140111152357.GB28133@notk.org> <20140111154146.GA976@lenat> <20140113090444.GA8904@notk.org> <52D3B71B.40802@cea.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Doing compiler patch review with a dedicated mailing-list On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:58:11PM +0000, Kakadu wrote: > Qt Gerrit [1] is the most fascinating review system I have ever seen. > Everybody can push commits and add reviewers for it. CI is enabled for > every change. Any chance that OCaml will have the same available? > > [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75024 Late to the party as usual, but I use Gerrit for Openstack, and it's horrible. Mailing lists *much* preferred for patch reviews. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat