From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB067F6C6
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:35:19 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  goswin-v-b@web.de) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.15.14;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="goswin-v-b@web.de";
  x-sender="goswin-v-b@web.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  goswin-v-b@web.de) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=212.227.15.14;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="goswin-v-b@web.de";
  x-sender="goswin-v-b@web.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mout.web.de) identity=helo;
  client-ip=212.227.15.14;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="goswin-v-b@web.de";
  x-sender="postmaster@mout.web.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvcBACjh4FLU4w8OnGdsb2JhbABbuj2CS4MFgQ8WDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQEEOk8LGAklDwUoiCQBGL57H4YOF44UbxaDDoEUBJghhjESjwQ
X-IPAS-Result: AvcBACjh4FLU4w8OnGdsb2JhbABbuj2CS4MFgQ8WDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQEEOk8LGAklDwUoiCQBGL57H4YOF44UbxaDDoEUBJghhjESjwQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,705,1384297200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="54484213"
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 23 Jan 2014 10:35:19 +0100
Received: from frosties.localnet ([37.49.32.119]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAvFE-1VyXSs3oIO-009x4M for <caml-list@inria.fr>;
 Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:35:18 +0100
Received: from mrvn by frosties.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <goswin-v-b@web.de>)
	id 1W6Ggw-0005aI-Dk
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:35:18 +0100
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:35:18 +0100
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20140123093518.GC20624@frosties>
References: <52DF18CB.6000809@caesar.elte.hu>
 <52DF76A5.1020805@libertysurf.fr>
 <52E01A76.7050109@caesar.elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52E01A76.7050109@caesar.elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:V3txRl/7SnTXdzrAj0Cn66VAHa4qWRiKqK8+zYK50w+LHIxLEYH
 nhcwQwYKuihn2LNTiiMUm4cY4PmeWUpp+VaoeyFAfWqgNLUYm9rVj25fD67Y65lBksl2wGP
 TykXvr9D6GusAfTOHEMvm05XggfBJtadorqTPKaNl389CIRVjzqKDvvObbacLw5UxPAWYo+
 Brr84F5McEjC/hXuKJ5wA==
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Announcing yet another Makefile for OCaml

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:22:30PM +0100, Christian Rinderknecht wrote:
> Dear William and list members,
> 
> On 01/22/2014 08:43 AM, William R wrote:
> >could you explain differences  with OCamlMakefile
> 
> This is a fair question, since Markus' work has been around for quite
> a while, but I am afraid that I never used it. Nevertheless, I went
> through the documentation and the source code and here are the main
> differences I can see at the moment (my apologies to Markus if I am
> mistaken):
> 
> OCamlMakefile vs my Makefile
>   * Support for ocamlfind vs none

No ocamlfind? That realy sucks. Anything non trivial will require some
extras, if only batteries, core or unix. You realy need support for
ocamlfind so adding libraries becomes easy.

MfG
	Goswin