From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4157F707 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:57:26 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: Neutral (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of simon.cruanes.2007@m4x.org does not assert whether or not 129.104.30.34 is permitted sender) identity=pra; client-ip=129.104.30.34; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-sender="simon.cruanes.2007@m4x.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="spf2.0" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org designates 129.104.30.34 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=129.104.30.34; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-sender="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="spf2.0" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@mx1.polytechnique.org designates 129.104.30.34 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=129.104.30.34; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-sender="postmaster@mx1.polytechnique.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4CAEPw01KBaB4inGdsb2JhbABAGoNDg1S3fxYOAQEBAQEIFAk8giUBAQEEI0sLEAsYCSECAg8FDTwTh3ADEQ02qU6VQQ2FKheMdIEoGgEBg0WBSASWK4FrgTGLKohpgXA X-IPAS-Result: Ag4CAEPw01KBaB4inGdsb2JhbABAGoNDg1S3fxYOAQEBAQEIFAk8giUBAQEEI0sLEAsYCSECAg8FDTwTh3ADEQ02qU6VQQ2FKheMdIEoGgEBg0WBSASWK4FrgTGLKohpgXA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,653,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="44608385" Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org ([129.104.30.34]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 13 Jan 2014 14:57:25 +0100 Received: from emmental.inria.fr (emmental.inria.fr [128.93.0.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22AD414091326; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:57:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:57:23 +0100 From: Simon Cruanes To: Thomas Refis Cc: Gabriel Scherer , Daniel =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=BCnzli?= , =?utf-8?B?RnJhbsOnb2lz?= Bobot , caml users Message-ID: <20140113135723.GS11251@emmental.inria.fr> References: <20140111152357.GB28133@notk.org> <20140111154146.GA976@lenat> <20140113090444.GA8904@notk.org> <52D3B71B.40802@cea.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6FinHCQBQ0zFDOqT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at svoboda.polytechnique.org (Mon Jan 13 14:57:25 2014 +0100 (CET)) X-Spam-Flag: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, queueID=40F9A14091328 X-Org-Mail: simon.cruanes.2007@polytechnique.org Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Doing compiler patch review with a dedicated mailing-list --6FinHCQBQ0zFDOqT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Thomas Refis a =C3=A9crit : > 2014/1/13 Gabriel Scherer : > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Daniel B=C3=BCnzli > > wrote: > >> It's not only easy to browse, it's *great* to browse: all the web-base= d mailing list archives I interact with are not even able to follow a threa= d running across two month. I really feel we're in 2014. > > > > This is a bit too snarky for me to guess what you want. >=20 > I'd have thought that part was pretty obvious. If the discussion > starts on the 28th of a month, and is continued the next month. The > "sympa" interface gives you no easy way to follow the thread. You need > to "select" the second month, and find the thread again. >=20 > > I'm already doing a few reviews on mantis, and occasionally uses the > > github in-patch-commenting interface when people send a link to a > > github-hosted patch (eg. http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3D6274 > > ). >=20 > Since we're talking about it: I was a bit confused with that review. > Although *I* find the github interface nicer than mantis and the "in > patch comments" really useful, I didn't know whether I should answer > your comments on github or on mantis, and people on mantis might not > see the comments you did. > So I'm not sure that's really a good approach. (But of course that > particular patch was about ocamldoc, which no one really cares about, > so I guess that's ok) I like the github interface, but it's clear that it also comes with vendor lock-in. To mitigate it, may it be possible to duplicate every mail from github (issues, pull requests, i.e. any interesting discussion) to a separate mailing-list that would serve as archive+backup? The question is "how to store the mails for archive". my 2 cents --=20 Simon --6FinHCQBQ0zFDOqT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS0/DDAAoJEErAHQhJqmK2ye4P/3KnD3dkWZXqIropBivfolhn U9Iumv+IF1MMsJuO1Oi2L/CqUyUh9bYLL9jY+8JWA/ouuARaFvRY+Ic36OWN4Aow 3d/BcdhxsbtpSP94/QbKOSG9J9if1NQRgEsZGZfVglv/r+/QfG6JAr0h4AEY1GCv rvWu9y1wOpuX4ewKxrDZ0iVYapfZ0Z7L640reD1JSswcJZUbxcLTlHP2PEmlAahh OuCObvxdMIMTZhymMZYkiivq8An84Ne9Ra/UMC/IWw36s5ebiIOzyn6XXKzRBuCC 3I7UUJbF9QlheEYZyLpeDcf/ZP3CKCuI2jYfFKs6Sk6ChhBynpkVYpVAx5XCfdeq pZKt+Jjl62e3NyXJFl7SzDiBksaT/rDkEgmmaake+HhDZAPJZDHDei7Y5MTatUH/ o9YOMk0WnWnNuoHx2qDQ8aJVKLPvla23jTwB2RWvayTmE5DTQKVFLNw8p3pD60J4 TIAPbzP7GAYCormOAS3fU08/xr94pv9k6XAc1YN0/TeX3YnMRphpeNiKUr+z6MXy BzvYk2kXS5sqfLJTl4I9p+adozxZTzoRO5UGPeNZeMBYwhzB0AncO6ew1sNn4jqZ DyGzjTHBNQSGmbamyeXq6a95R9OmBn64N6ttIWlb5WoiI+FxGNyWAHQmYG74IG+S p0QlDq4SO0esSLLuyFvL =mj+R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6FinHCQBQ0zFDOqT--