From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rich@annexia.org>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D6D7EE99
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:32:16 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rich@annexia.org) identity=pra; client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  rich@annexia.org designates 80.68.91.176 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjcBACCBuFJQRFuwl2dsb2JhbABZhkUTtwmBHhYOAQEBAQEIFgc8giUBAQEEOj8QCxgJExIPBSiIPAHLHBeGJ4h+BxaDDYETBJgWlUI8
X-IPAS-Result: AjcBACCBuFJQRFuwl2dsb2JhbABZhkUTtwmBHhYOAQEBAQEIFgc8giUBAQEEOj8QCxgJExIPBSiIPAHLHBeGJ4h+BxaDDYETBJgWlUI8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,538,1384297200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="42140708"
Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 23 Dec 2013 19:32:13 +0100
Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <rich@annexia.org>)
	id 1VvAIW-0004lq-MS; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:32:12 +0000
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:32:12 +0000
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rich@annexia.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com
Message-ID: <20131223183212.GE15442@annexia.org>
References: <20131223150027.GA15442@annexia.org>
 <20131223150719.GB15442@annexia.org>
 <20131223153202.GC15442@annexia.org>
 <20131223171641.GD15442@annexia.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131223171641.GD15442@annexia.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Trying out the arm64 compiler

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 05:16:41PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> An update on this:
> 
> The error also occurs with 055d5c0379e42b4f561cb1fc5159659d8e9a7b6f /
> trunk@13909 which is the arm64 merge commit.
> 
> I've asked if we can run the test binary on real aarch64 hardware
> (which I don't have direct access to, but I know people who do) to see
> if it behaves the same way as on qemu.

It turns out to be a *qemu* issue, as the same binary works
fine on the actual hardware.  A surprise for me.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat