From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864727EE51
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 26 May 2013 23:49:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=pra;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de) identity=helo;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am4BAPqColHAbSoIlGdsb2JhbABaxTiBBRYOAQEBAQkLCQkUBCSCIwEBBAF5BQsZExMSDxI2BhOHewMJBgSzYw2IaoxGglcHg1QDjmuGaoFljB6DVIRg
X-IPAS-Result: Am4BAPqColHAbSoIlGdsb2JhbABaxTiBBRYOAQEBAQkLCQkUBCSCIwEBBAF5BQsZExMSDxI2BhOHewMJBgSzYw2IaoxGglcHg1QDjmuGaoFljB6DVIRg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,746,1363129200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="19039040"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 May 2013 23:49:13 +0200
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
Received: from localhost (okapi.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.117])
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id r4QLnBAP015058;
	Sun, 26 May 2013 23:49:11 +0200
Received: from e178005108.adsl.alicedsl.de (e178005108.adsl.alicedsl.de
	[85.178.5.108]) by webmail.in-berlin.de (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sun,
	26 May 2013 23:49:11 +0200
Message-ID: <20130526234911.41866xca7wgoirfb@webmail.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 23:49:11 +0200
From: "Oliver Bandel" <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: "Malcolm Matalka" <mmatalka@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
References: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie>
	<20130526150008.GA2014@siouxsie>
	<CAKziXDXK7pU4+KzJMsfVMo+eVVb=EJ-aan_sXHZkaofQALhYyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 	<CAKziXDXK7pU4+KzJMsfVMo+eVVb=EJ-aan_sXHZkaofQALhYyg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Problems to get larger user base ... (Re: [Caml-list] OCaml's
 variables)

Zitat von "Malcolm Matalka" <mmatalka@gmail.com> (Sun, 26 May 2013  
20:38:12 +0200)

> I think ocaml had bigger problems to solve than this if it wants a larger
> user base.
[...]

Which "bigger problems" do you think of?
And how to solve them?


Ciao,
    Oliver