From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CDA87EE51 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 23:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of marek@xivilization.net) identity=pra; client-ip=178.63.18.39; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marek@xivilization.net"; x-sender="marek@xivilization.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of marek@xivilization.net designates 178.63.18.39 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=178.63.18.39; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marek@xivilization.net"; x-sender="marek@xivilization.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@coaxial.xivilization.net) identity=helo; client-ip=178.63.18.39; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marek@xivilization.net"; x-sender="postmaster@coaxial.xivilization.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As8JALCEnlGyPxIn/2dsb2JhbABZgwiDJL8yBAQBgQwWdIIjAQEEAUABATgECwshJQ9IGYgHCqdIhD4BBX6MdAaPJBaDPpc9kUGDEQ X-IPAS-Result: As8JALCEnlGyPxIn/2dsb2JhbABZgwiDJL8yBAQBgQwWdIIjAQEEAUABATgECwshJQ9IGYgHCqdIhD4BBX6MdAaPJBaDPpc9kUGDEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,730,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="15500595" Received: from coaxial.xivilization.net ([178.63.18.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 23 May 2013 23:07:39 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xivilization.net; s=xiv; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=lLzp6pVi8oO003dqdU4nepo9O1lkXMNPS/LE/2lBss4=; b=RDa/oTqDHQhqRUrvONpiREonxG+g/Npe3QOGgy9u+IbUc315ppkIt5ro8tcpwYqlbRUgM36DO433Z1FSjeJ9jSZzXvmvRGCbgSnBpYzw1Frkn/Yl2OLjf9iHcjjE5ETQ; Received: from ppp-93-104-164-115.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([93.104.164.115] helo=localhost.localdomain) by coaxial.xivilization.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UfcjZ-0005Bn-SZ for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 23 May 2013 23:07:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 23:07:35 +0200 From: Marek Kubica To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20130523230735.14d56df3@xivilization.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20130522123427.GA1894@siouxsie> <519CC1C8.3060502@etorok.net> <20130522171907.GA6073@notk.org> <519DB8D2.5080102@glondu.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.1 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Licenses - Confusion On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:41:09 +0100 Daniel B=FCnzli wrote: > If you need a lawyer to understand your freedom you are not free > anymore. Stop feeding the lawyers and the bureaucrats. But then there is the other legal framework that makes some assumptions. That's why the Apache license has some clauses on patents. I read the GPL2 some time ago and found it not that difficult to understand, actually. If you want a BSD-like license for humans, there's the WTFPL. I think I'd agree with St=E9phane about the classification. regards, Marek